Michaels v. Grant County Animal Shelter et al
| Patricia Michaels |
| Stephen Wood, Kathleen Ritzi, Grant County Animal Shelter and Grant County |
| 2:2018cv00121 |
| July 16, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| Covington Office |
| Grant |
| David L Bunning |
| Candace J Smith |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 14, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 REPLY to #8 RESPONSE TO PARTIAL MOTION TO DISMISS filed by Grant County, Grant County Animal Shelter, Kathleen Ritzi, Kathleen Ritzi, Stephen Wood, Stephen Wood. (Salsburey, Joshua) |
| Filing 8 RESPONSE to Motion re #5 MOTION to Dismiss for failure to state a claim by Grant County, Grant County Animal Shelter, Kathleen Ritzi, Kathleen Ritzi, Stephen Wood, Stephen Wood filed by Patricia Michaels. (Bucher, Anthony) |
Filing 7
ORDER: that the Motion for Extension of Time #6 is granted. Defendants shall have up to and including twenty-one (21) days after the Court has entered a ruling on Defendant's Partial Motion to Dismiss #5 within which to answer or otherwise respond to any remaining claims in Plaintiff's Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Candace J. Smith on 07/31/2018. (KRB)cc: COR Modified text on 8/2/2018 (KRB).
|
| Filing 6 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Grant County, Grant County Animal Shelter, Kathleen Ritzi, Kathleen Ritzi, Stephen Wood, Stephen Wood Motions referred to Candace J. Smith. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Salsburey, Joshua) |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Dismiss for failure to state a claim by Grant County, Grant County Animal Shelter, Kathleen Ritzi, Kathleen Ritzi, Stephen Wood, Stephen Wood (Attachments: #1 Appendix 1-Counts to be Dismissed Against Each Defendant, #2 Proposed Order)(Salsburey, Joshua) |
|
Filing 4
STANDING REFERRAL ORDER: 1) Case referred to assigned U.S. Magistrate Judge at Covington to supervise discovery and pretrial proceedings; 2) Magistrate Judge is authorized to conduct all pretrial and status conferences, to hold such hearings as may be required, and to rule on nondispositive motions, except motions in limine. Dispositive motions and motions in limine will be referred by the Clerk of this Court to the undersigned. The final pretrial conference and trial will also be before the undersigned, unless parties agree to a trial by a Magistrate Judge; 3) Discovery disputes shall be resolved in the following manner: (1) Parties to meet/confer in an attempt to resolve disputes; (2) If parties unable to resolve such disputes formally, they shall attempt to resolve their disagreements by telephone conference with the Magistrate Judge; 3) If parties unable to resolve their disputes after conference with the Magistrate Judge, they may file appropriate written motions with the Court, which shall include the certification required. Signed by Judge David L. Bunning on 1/13/2011.(ECO)cc: COR
|
| Filing 3 FRCP 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Grant County, Grant County Animal Shelter. (ECO) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Grant County Circuit Court, case number 18-CI-00194. ( Filing fee $400; receipt number 0643-4120306), filed by Grant County Animal Shelter, Grant County, Stephen Wood individually, Stephen Wood officially, Kathleen Ritziindividually, Kathleen Ritzi officially. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-State Court Notice of Filing Notice of Removal, #2 Exhibit B-State Court Record, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(ECO) |
| Conflict Check run. (ECO) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
