Huber v. Vinnat Hotels, LLC et al
| Julie Huber |
| Vinnat Hotels, LLC and Rajeev "Rick" Chopra |
| 2:2018cv00133 |
| July 25, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| Covington Office |
| Boone |
| William O Bertelsman |
| Candace J Smith |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 25, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
STANDING REFERRAL ORDER: 1) Case referred to presiding Magistrate Judge to supervise discovery and pretrial proceedings; 2) Magistrate Judge is authorized to conduct all pretrial and status conferences, hold hearings as required, and rule on nondispositive motions. Dispositive motions and motions in limine will be referred by the Clerk of court to the undersigned. Subject to other provisions of law, the final pretrial conference and trial will be before the undersigned, unless the parties agree to a trial by a Magistrate Judge, pursuant to 28 USC 636(c). Signed by Judge William O. Bertelsman on 6/18/2010.(TJZ)cc: COR
|
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Rajeev "Rick" Chopra, Vinnat Hotels, LLC; Summons issued and returned to counsel electronically (TJZ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $400; receipt number 0643-4128187), filed by Julie Huber. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(TJZ) |
| Conflict Check run. (TJZ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
