Santini v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance Company
Plaintiff: George Santini
Defendant: Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance Company
Case Number: 2:2018cv00142
Filed: August 10, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Office: Covington Office
County: Kenton
Presiding Judge: David L Bunning
Referring Judge: Candace J Smith
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 26, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 26, 2018 Filing 12 INITIAL DISCLOSURES of Defendant by Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Traffic Collision Report, #2 Exhibit Photographs of Plaintiff's vehicle, #3 Exhibit Repair estimate of Plaintiff's vehicle, #4 Exhibit Photographs of Christy Bauer's vehicle, #5 Exhibit Affidavit of Christy Bauer, #6 Exhibit EUO of George Santini, #7 Exhibit Certified copy of MetLife Policy)(Bruns, Thomas)
September 24, 2018 Filing 11 INITIAL DISCLOSURES by George Santini.(Lawrence, Danielle)
September 17, 2018 Filing 9 CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge. Case reassigned to Magistrate Magistrate Judge Candace J. Smith. Signed by Judge David L. Bunning on 9/17/2018.(LST)cc: COR
September 17, 2018 ***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Judge David L. Bunning for review: #7 Report of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting, #8 Notice (LST)
September 14, 2018 Filing 8 NOTICE by Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance Company Consent and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge (Bruns, Thomas)
September 14, 2018 Filing 7 JOINT REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Bruns, Thomas)
August 15, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER FOR MEETING AND REPORT; 1)Parties to meet w/in 21 days to discuss nature/basis of claims and defenses and possibility for a prompt settlement, to make or arrange for the disclosures required and to develop a proposed discovery plan; 2)10 days thereafter, parties to file a Joint Status Report containing: (a) proposed discovery plan; (b) parties estimate of the time necessary to file pretrial motions; (c) parties belief as to whether the matter is suitable for some form of alternative dispute resolution such as mediation; (d) parties' estimate as the probable length of trial; (e) whether the parties consent to the presiding magistrate judge for all purposes; 3)Should parties find that a joint report is not possible, parties to file individual reports which the Court will entertain for the purposes of setting out its Scheduling Order. Signed by Judge David L. Bunning on 8/15/2018. (Attachments: #1 MJ Consent Form)(LST)cc: COR Modified text on 8/17/2018 (LST).
August 14, 2018 ***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Judge David L. Buunning for review: #5 Answer to Complaint (LST)
August 13, 2018 Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance Company.(Bruns, Thomas)
August 10, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 4 STANDING REFERRAL ORDER: : 1) Case referred to assigned U.S. Magistrate Judge at Covington to supervise discovery and pretrial proceedings; 2) Magistrate Judge is authorized to conduct all pretrial and status conferences, to hold such hearings as may be required, and to rule on nondispositive motions, except motions in limine. Dispositive motions and motions in limine will be referred by the Clerk of this Court to the undersigned. The final pretrial conference and trial will also be before the undersigned, unless parties agree to a trial by a Magistrate Judge; 3) Discovery disputes shall be resolved in the following manner: (1) Parties to meet/confer in an attempt to resolve disputes; (2) If parties unable to resolve such disputes formally, they shall attempt to resolve their disagreements by telephone conference with the Magistrate Judge; 3) If parties unable to resolve their disputes after conference with the Magistrate Judge, they may file appropriate written motions with the Court, which shall include the certification required. Signed by Judge David L. Bunning on 1/13/2011.(ECO)cc: COR
August 10, 2018 Filing 3 FRCP 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance Company identifying Corporate Parent MetLife, Inc. for Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance Company. (ECO)
August 10, 2018 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Kenton Circuit Court, case number 18-CI-01339. ( Filing fee $400; receipt number 0643-4142324), filed by Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 State Court Record, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(ECO)
August 10, 2018 Conflict Check run. (ECO)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Santini v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance Company
Represented By: Lucinda C. Shirooni
Represented By: Thomas B. Bruns
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: George Santini
Represented By: Danielle L. Lawrence
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?