Hutton v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
| Janet Lynn Hutton |
| Stryker Howmedica Osteonics Inc. and Howmedica Osteonics Corp. |
| 2:2019cv00048 |
| April 16, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| William O Bertelsman |
| Candace J Smith |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 1, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
ORDER: That the following procedure be used to address discovery disputes:1. Parties shall first meet and/or confer in good faith and attempt to resolve discovery disputes between themselves, without judicial intervention;2. If the parties are unable to resolve a dispute after conferring directly, they shall attempt to resolve their disagreement by calling the undersigned's chambers to schedule an informal telephone conference; and,3. If, and only if, the parties are unable to resolve their discovery impasse after informal telephone conference, they may file appropriate written motions with the Court. Written motions regarding discovery shall include the certification required by Civil Rule 37(a)(1) and Local Rule of Civil Practice 37.1, if applicable. Signed by Magistrate Judge Candace J. Smith on 7/1/2019.(ECO)cc: COR
|
| Filing 13 MINUTE ENTRY ORDER FOR DOCKET CALL held on 6/19/2019 before Judge William O. Bertelsman: Parties present as noted. IT IS ORDERED that the Court adopts the parties' Joint Report of Parties Planning Meeting #10 as follows: 1) All written discovery shall be completed on or before May 4, 2020. All fact discovery shall be completed on or before June 1, 2020 with joint or separate status reports due the same date. 2) On or before July 2, 2020, plaintiff shall disclose expert witnesses as required by Rule 26(a)(2). On or before September 2, 2020, defendant shall disclose expert witnesses as required by Rule 26(a)(2). 3) On or before February 3, 2020, the parties shall amend pleadings. 4) Dispositive motions shall be filed on or before November 2, 2020. Although documents must now be filed electronically with the Court Clerk, a PAPER court courtesy copy shall be provided to CHAMBERS within 48 hours of the filing of the brief or memorandum in support of any motion, where such brief or memorandum (including any attached exhibits) exceeds 10 pages. (Court Reporter LISA WIESMAN.) (ECO)cc: COR |
| Filing 12 INITIAL DISCLOSURES by Howmedica Osteonics Corp..(Cross, Jacqueline) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Janet Lynn Hutton. (Schloemer, Douglas) |
| Filing 10 JOINT REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Cross, Jacqueline) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER: that said DOCKET CALL be, and hereby is, set for WEDNESDAY, JUNE 19, 2019 AT 1:00 P.M., to be held at the United States Courthouse, 35 West Fifth Street, Covington, Kentucky in the 5th Floor Courtroom before Judge William O. Bertelsman. The parties shall confer and file a proposed scheduling order at least three (3) days before docket call. Counsel must attend the docket call in person and be sufficiently familiar with the case to answer any inquires the Court may have. Signed by Judge William O. Bertelsman on 5/23/2019.(ECO)cc: COR
|
| Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint by Howmedica Osteonics Corp..(Cross, Jacqueline) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER: That Howmedica Osteonics Corp. is hereby substituted fordefendant, Stryker Corporation, in this action. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiff's claims against Stryker Corporation are dismissed in their entirety without prejudice. Signed by Judge William O. Bertelsman on 4/24/2019.(ECO)cc: COR
|
| ***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Candace J. Smith for review: re #6 Proposed Agreed Order/Stipulation of Substitution of Parties by Stryker Howmedica Osteonics Inc. (TJZ) |
| Filing 6 Proposed Agreed Order/Stipulation of Substitution of Parties by Stryker Howmedica Osteonics Inc.. (Cross, Jacqueline) |
| Filing 5 FRCP 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Stryker Howmedica Osteonics Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Stryker Corporation for Stryker Howmedica Osteonics Inc... (Cross, Jacqueline) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY RE: FAILURE TO FILE FRCP 7.1 DISCLOSURES to counsel of record, Jacqueline Cross. #1 Notice of Removal has been filed by Stryker Howmedica Osteonics Inc. without the required Rule 7.1 Disclosure statement. Rule 7.1 Disclosures must be filed within fourteen (14) calendar days. Failure to file the Disclosure Statement will cause the case to be submitted to the presiding judge for further action. cc: COR (ECO) |
|
Filing 3
STANDING REFERRAL ORDER: 1) Case referred to presiding Magistrate Judge to supervise discovery and pretrial proceedings; 2) Magistrate Judge is authorized to conduct all pretrial and status conferences, hold hearings as required, and rule on nondispositive motions. Dispositive motions and motions in limine will be referred by the Clerk of court to the undersigned. Subject to other provisions of law, the final pretrial conference and trial will be before the undersigned, unless the parties agree to a trial by a Magistrate Judge, pursuant to 28 USC 636(c).. Signed by Judge William O. Bertelsman on 6/18/2010.(ECO)cc: COR
|
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Kenton Circuit Court, case number 19-CI-00445. ( Filing fee $400; receipt number 0643-4336494), filed by Stryker Howmedica Osteonics Inc.. (Attachments: #1 State Court Record)(ECO) |
| Conflict Check run. (ECO) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
