McDonald v. Kenton County Detention Center et al
Plaintiff: Anthony Robert McDonald, II
Defendant: Southern Health Partners and Kenton County Detention Center
Case Number: 2:2019cv00052
Filed: April 26, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Office: Covington Office
Presiding Judge: David L Bunning
Referring Judge: Candace J Smith
2 Judge: P SO
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions (Prison Condition)
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 18, 2019 Filing 7 JUDGMENT: 1. Plaintiff's #3 Complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 2. Judgment is entered in favor of Defendants. 3. This is a FINAL and APPEALABLE Judgment and there is no just cause for delay. Signed by Judge David L. Bunning on 6/18/2019.(LST)cc: COR, Anthony Robert McDonald via U.S. Mail
June 18, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: 1. Anthony Robert McDonald's #3 Complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE and this matter is Stricken from the Active Docket. Signed by Judge David L. Bunning on 6/18/2019.(LST)cc: COR, Anthony Robert McDonald via U.S. Mail
April 29, 2019 ***MOTION SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of PSO for review: re #1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Robert A. McDonald, II (LST)
April 29, 2019 MOTIONS REFERRED: #1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Robert A. McDonald, II Motions referred to P SO. (LST)
April 26, 2019 Filing 5 IMPORTANT NOTICE to Pro Se Filer: Information relating to pro se filings and F.R.Civ.P. 5.2 requiring personal identifiers be partially redacted from documents filed with the court. #Click here for more information on the rules. It is the sole responsibility of counsel and the parties to comply with the rules requiring redaction of personal data identifiers.cc: pro se filer via U.S. Mail (Attachments: #1 Sample Caption)(LST)
April 26, 2019 Filing 3 COMPLAINT (NO PROCESS REQUESTED)., filed by Robert A. McDonald, II, Pro Se(LST) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/26/2019: #1 Envelope Not Postmarked) (LST).
April 26, 2019 Filing 2 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Robert A. McDonald, II. (Attachments: #1 Inmate Balance History Report)(LST)
April 26, 2019 Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Robert A. McDonald, II, Pro seMotions referred to Candace J. Smith. (LST)
April 26, 2019 Conflict Check run. (LST)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: McDonald v. Kenton County Detention Center et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Anthony Robert McDonald, II
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Southern Health Partners
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kenton County Detention Center
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?