Mahon v. McKeen et al
| Patrick Thomas Mahon |
| K.C.D.C. and McKeen |
| 2:2019cv00070 |
| May 31, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| David L Bunning |
| P SO |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 31, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 IMPORTANT NOTICE to Pro Se Filer: Information relating to pro se filings and F.R.Civ.P. 5.2 requiring personal identifiers be partially redacted from documents filed with the court. #Click here for more information on the rules. It is the sole responsibility of counsel and the parties to comply with the rules requiring redaction of personal data identifiers.cc: pro se filer via U.S. Mail (Attachments: #1 Sample Caption)(LST) |
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT referred to Judge P SO., filed by Patrick Thomas Mahon. Related document: #1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Patrick Thomas Mahon filed by Patrick Thomas Mahon. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons, #2 Form regarding exhaustion of administrative remedies)(LST) |
| Filing 2 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Patrick Thomas Mahon. (LST) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Patrick Thomas Mahon, Pro SeMotions referred to P SO. (LST) |
| ***MOTION SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of PSO for review: re #1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Patrick Thomas Mahon (LST) |
| Conflict Check run. (LST) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
