USA v. $10,300.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY
| USA |
| $10,300.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY |
| 2:2019cv00074 |
| June 5, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| David L Bunning |
| Candace J Smith |
| Drug Related Seizure of Property |
| 21 U.S.C. ยง 841 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 6, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO FILE COMPLAINT FOR FORFEITURE : that, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 983(a)(3)(A), the JOINT MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE COMPLAINT FOR FORFEITURE #1 is hereby GRANTED, and the date by which the United States is required to file a complaint for forfeiture and/or obtain an indictment alleging forfeiture is hereby extended to July 19, 2019. The Clerk is instructed to send a courtesy copy of this Order to Attorney Jacek W. Lentz, counsel for Jahmar Barksdale, at the address provided in the Joint Motion. Signed by Magistrate Judge Candace J. Smith on 06/06/2019.(KRB)cc: COR, courtesy copy of this Order to Attorney Jacek W. Lentz, via US Mail
|
| ***MOTION SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Magistrate Judge Candace J. Smith for review: re #1 MOTION for Extension of Time by USA (KRB) |
|
Filing 3
STANDING REFERRAL ORDER; 1)Case referred to Magistrate Judge at Covington to supervise discovery and pretrial proceedings. Unless otherwise ordered by the Court, case will revert back to undersigned to hold the final pretrial conference and trial; 2)Mag. Judge authorized to conduct all pretrial/status conferences, to hold hearings as may be required and to rule on non-dispositive motions. Dispositive motions and motions in limine will be referred to the undersigned. Final pretrial conference and trial will also be before the undersigned, unless the parties agree to a trial by a Mag. Judge; 3)Discovery disputes to be resolved in following manner: (1)Parties to meet/confer in an attempt to resolve disputes; (2)If unable to resolve disputes, they shall attempt to resolve their disagreement by telephone conference w/Mag. Judge; 3)If still unable to resolve their disputes, they may file appropriate written motions with the court.. Signed by Judge David L. Bunning on 01/13/2011.(KRB)cc: COR
|
| Filing 1 JOINT MOTION TO EXTEND TIMETO FILE COMPLAINT FOR FORFEITURE Motions referred to Candace J. Smith. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(KRB) |
| Conflict Check run. (KRB) |
| ***MOTION SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Magistrate Judge Candace J. Smith for review: re #1 MOTION for Extension of Time by USA (KRB) Modified Text on 6/6/2019 (KRB). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: USA v. $10,300.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: $10,300.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: USA | |
| Represented By: | Rajbir Datta, AUSA |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
