Williams v. Wright et al
Plaintiff: Rodger Williams and Willow Williams
Defendant: Lovins, Henne, James Daley, Murry, Brandan Roberts, Burkhart, Lt. Wright and Love
Case Number: 2:2019cv00077
Filed: June 13, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Presiding Judge: David L Bunning
Referring Judge: P SO
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 18, 2019 Filing 17 Mail Returned as Undeliverable Released. Mail sent to Rodger Williams re #10 Order on Motion for TRO, Order on Motion to Compel (ECO)
July 18, 2019 Filing 16 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Rodger Williams re #15 Order on Motion for TRO, Order on Motion to Amend/Correct (ECO)
July 1, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER: That Williams's latest motions ( #11 , #12 , #13 and #14 ) areDENIED AS MOOT. Signed by Judge David L. Bunning on 7/1/2019. (ECO)cc: COR w/copy mailed to Rodger Williams, pro se, at address listed on the docket sheet.
June 26, 2019 ***MOTION SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of PSO for review: re #13 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order by Rodger Williams, #12 MOTION to Amend/Correct by Rodger Williams, #14 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order by Rodger Williams, #11 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order by Rodger Williams (TJZ)
June 25, 2019 Filing 14 MOTION for TRO Injuction by Rodger Williams, pro se. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Grievance, #2 Declaration, #3 Envelope postmarked 6-24-19)(TJZ)
June 25, 2019 Filing 13 MOTION for TRO Injunction by Rodger Williams, pro se. (TJZ)
June 25, 2019 Filing 12 MOTION to Amend by Rodger Williams, pro se. Motions referred to P SO. (TJZ)
June 25, 2019 Filing 11 MOTION for TRO Emergency Injunction by Rodger Williams, pro se. (TJZ)
June 24, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER: Williams' latest motions #8 Motion for TRO and #9 Motion to Compel are DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by Judge David L. Bunning on 6/24/2019. (TJZ)cc: COR, Rodger Williams via US Mail
June 20, 2019 Filing 9 MOTION to Compel by Rodger Williams, pro se. Motions referred to P SO. (TJZ)
June 20, 2019 Filing 8 MOTION for 48 HR. EMERGENCY TRO HEARING by Rodger Williams, pro se. (Attachments: #1 cover letter, #2 envelope postmarked 6-19-19)(TJZ)
June 20, 2019 ***MOTION SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of PSO for review: re #8 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order by Rodger Williams, #9 MOTION to Compel by Rodger Williams (TJZ)
June 18, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER: 1) Williams's complaint #1 is DISMISSED without prejudice, all pending motions are DENIED as moot, and this action is STRICKEN from the Court's docket; (2) The Clerk's Office shall send Williams an E.D. Ky. 520 Form, A.O. 240 Form, and E.D. Ky. 523 Form; and (3) Williams is not barred from filing a new complaint regarding the claims raised in her submissions, but she may only proceed in accordance with theinstructions set forth in this Order. Signed by Judge David L. Bunning on 6/18/2019.(ECO)cc: COR w/copy of this Order, EDKY Form 520, A.O. 240 Form and EDKY 532 Form mailed to Rodger Williams, pro se, at address listed on the docket sheet.
June 13, 2019 Filing 6 IMPORTANT NOTICE to Pro Se Filer: Information relating to pro se filings and F.R.Civ.P. 5.2 requiring personal identifiers be partially redacted from documents filed with the court. #Click here for more information on the rules. It is the sole responsibility of counsel and the parties to comply with the rules requiring redaction of personal data identifiers.cc: pro se filer via U.S. Mail (Attachments: #1 Sample caption page)(ECO)
June 13, 2019 Filing 5 MOTION for Emergency T.R.O. Injunction by Rodger Williams, pro se. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Grievance Forms)(ECO)
June 13, 2019 Filing 4 MOTION to Compel by Rodger Williams, pro se. Motions referred to P SO. (ECO)
June 13, 2019 Filing 2 COMPLAINT (NO PROCESS REQUESTED)., filed by Rodger Williams, pro se. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-Grievance Forms)(ECO) (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/13/2019: #2 Envelope post marked 6/12/2019) (ECO).
June 13, 2019 Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Rodger Williams. Motions referred to P SO. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit /Declaration of Rodger Williams, #2 Autorization of Rodger Williams)(ECO)
June 13, 2019 ***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of PSO for review: #1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Rodger Williams, #4 MOTION to Compel by Rodger Williams, #2 Complaint, #5 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order by Rodger Williams (ECO)
June 13, 2019 Conflict Check run. (ECO)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Williams v. Wright et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rodger Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Willow Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lovins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Henne
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: James Daley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Murry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Brandan Roberts
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Burkhart
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lt. Wright
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Love
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?