USA v. $69,005.00 in United States Currency
| USA |
| $69,005.00 in United States Currency |
| Derrick Morgan |
| 2:2019cv00115 |
| August 23, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| David L Bunning |
| Candace J Smith |
| Drug Related Seizure of Property |
| 21 U.S.C. ยง 881 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 21, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| ***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of David L. Bunning for review: #12 Answer to Complaint (TJZ) |
| Filing 12 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand by Derrick Morgan.(Benincasa, Joseph) |
| Filing 11 CLAIM Forfeiture by Derrick Morgan. (Benincasa, Joseph) |
Filing 10
VIRTUAL ORDER: granting #9 MOTION for Joseph Benincasa to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Claimant Derrick Morgan, the requirements of Joint Local Civil Rule 83.2 having been satisfied.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Candace J. Smith on 10/9/2019. (LST)cc: COR, Joseph Benincasa via U.S. Mail
|
| Clerk's Note: ECF Registration form e-mailed to Lexington this date re #9 MOTION for Joseph Benincasa to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Derrick Morgan. (LST) |
| Filing 9 MOTION for Joseph Benincasa to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Derrick Morgan Motions referred to Candace J. Smith. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Proposed Order, #3 Receipt)(LST) |
| BAR STATUS Check completed as to Joseph Benincasa re #9 MOTION for Joseph Benincasa to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Derrick Morgan. (LST) |
| ***MOTION SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Magistrate Judge Candace J. Smith for review: re #9 MOTION for Joseph Benincasa to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Derrick Morgan (LST) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE by USA (Datta, Rajbir) |
| Filing 7 PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN, $69,005 in USM custody as of 3/25/2019. (TJZ) |
| Filing 6 CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT to U.S. Marshals Service re #5 Warrant in Rem Issued. (LST) |
| Filing 5 Warrant in Rem Issued as to $69,005.00 in United States Currency; original & 4 certified copies delivered to USM (Attachments: #1 USM-285, #2 Certified Mail Receipt)(ECO) |
|
Filing 4
STANDING REFERRAL ORDER: 1) Case referred to assigned U.S. Magistrate Judge at Covington to supervise discovery and pretrial proceedings; 2) Magistrate Judge is authorized to conduct all pretrial and status conferences, to hold such hearings as may be required, and to rule on nondispositive motions, except motions in limine. Dispositive motions and motions in limine will be referred by the Clerk of this Court to the undersigned. The final pretrial conference and trial will also be before the undersigned, unless parties agree to a trial by a Magistrate Judge; 3) Discovery disputes shall be resolved in the following manner: (1) Parties to meet/confer in an attempt to resolve disputes; (2) If parties unable to resolve such disputes formally, they shall attempt to resolve their disagreements by telephone conference with the Magistrate Judge; 3) If parties unable to resolve their disputes after conference with the Magistrate Judge, they may file appropriate written motions with the Court, which shall include the certification required. Signed by Judge David L. Bunning on 1/13/2011.(ECO)cc: COR
|
| Filing 3 APPLICATION FOR WARRANT OF ARREST ISSUED BY CLERK by USA (Attachments: #1 Proposed Warrant, #2 USM-285)(ECO) |
| Filing 1 VERIFIED COMPLAINT (NO PROCESS REQUESTED) filed by USA. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Eli H. Sautter, #2 Affidavit of Eli H. Sautter, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(ECO) |
| Conflict Check run. (ECO) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
