Moser v. Nessler et al
| Gregory G. Moser |
| LJMN Holdings, LLC, Michael Nessler, ITC Capital Partners, LLC and Lou Jablonski |
| 2:2019cv00133 |
| September 30, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| David L Bunning |
| Candace J Smith |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, #8 Amended Complaint , ANSWER to #1 Complaint, #8 Amended Complaint by Lou Jablonski, LJMN Holdings, LLC, Michael Nessler.(Masters, Carrie) |
| Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Gregory G. Moser via Certified Mail to LJMN Holdings, LLC served on 10/7/2019, answer due 10/28/2019. (Attachments: #1 Receipt Certified Mail Return Receipt)(Winslow, Kyle) |
| Filing 10 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Gregory G. Moser. Lou Jablonski waiver sent on 10/28/2019, answer due 12/27/2019. (Winslow, Kyle) |
| Filing 9 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Gregory G. Moser. Michael Nessler waiver sent on 10/28/2019, answer due 12/27/2019. (Winslow, Kyle) |
| Filing 8 AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Lou Jablonski, LJMN Holdings, LLC, Michael Nessler, filed by Gregory G. Moser. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A: Broker Agreement)(Winslow, Kyle) |
Filing 7
ORDER: Plaintiff shall file an Amended Complaint on or before 10/17/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Candace J. Smith on 10/3/2019.(TJZ)cc: COR
|
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to All Defendants ; Summons issued and returned to counsel electronically (TJZ) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF FILING by Gregory G. Moser re #1 Complaint (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Nessler Summons, #2 Exhibit Jablonski Summons, #3 Exhibit LJMN Summons, #4 Exhibit ITC Capital Summons)(Winslow, Kyle) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF FILING by Gregory G. Moser re Clerk's Note, #1 Complaint (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Signed Complaint, #2 Exhibit A: Broker Agreement)(Winslow, Kyle) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER 1) Case referred to assigned U.S. Magistrate Judge at Covington to supervise discovery and pretrial proceedings; 2) Magistrate Judge is authorized to conduct all pretrial and status conferences, to hold such hearings as may be required, and to rule on nondispositive motions, except motions in limine. Dispositive motions and motions in limine will be referred by the Clerk of this Court to the undersigned. The final pretrial conference and trial will also be before the undersigned, unless parties agree to a trial by a Magistrate Judge; 3) Discovery disputes shall be resolved in the following manner: (1) Parties to meet/confer in an attempt to resolve disputes; (2) If parties unable to resolve such disputes formally, they shall attempt to resolve their disagreements by telephone conference with the Magistrate Judge; 3) If parties unable to resolve their disputes after conference with the Magistrate Judge, they may file appropriate written motions with the Court, which shall include the certification required. Signed by Judge David L. Bunning on 1/13/2011.(ECO)cc: COR
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand (NO PROCESS REQUESTED). ( Filing fee $400; receipt number 0643-4477982), filed by Gregory G. Moser. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Broker Agreement, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(ECO) |
| Conflict Check run. (ECO) |
| Clerk's Note: Counsel's office called and advised Clerk that the #1 Complaint was not signed. Counsel filing a Notice of Filing with the signed Complaint attached. (ECO) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
