Harmeling v. Monsanto Company
| Timothy L. Harmeling |
| Monsanto Company |
| 2:2019cv00134 |
| October 1, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| David L Bunning |
| Candace J Smith |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Clerk's Note: Case transferred has been opened in California Northern District as Case 3:19-cv-07357, filed 11/7/2019 re #6 Case Transferred to MDL. (TJZ) |
| Clerk's Note: JPMDL information re #6 Case Transferred to MDL extracted and electronically transmitted to AO. (SKV) |
| Clerk's Note re #6 Case Transferred to MDL: Case extracted and electronicallytransmitted to the USDC/CAND via CM/ECF.(CBD) |
| Filing 6 CERTIFIED ORDER received from Northern District of California re: Case Transfer to the MDL Panel pursuant to CTO No. 163 filed in MDL Case Number 2741. (ECO)cc: COR Modified to change file datef from 11/4/2019 to 11/1/2019 on 11/4/2019 (ECO). |
| Filing 5 INFORMATION COPY OF MDL CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER: MDL No. 2741 (KRB) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Monsanto Company; Summons issued and returned to counsel electronically (KRB) |
Filing 3
STANDING REFERRAL ORDER; 1)Case referred to Magistrate Judge at Covington to supervise discovery and pretrial proceedings. Unless otherwise ordered by the Court, case will revert back to undersigned to hold the final pretrial conference and trial; 2)Mag. Judge authorized to conduct all pretrial/status conferences, to hold hearings as may be required and to rule on non-dispositive motions. Dispositive motions and motions in limine will be referred to the undersigned. Final pretrial conference and trial will also be before the undersigned, unless the parties agree to a trial by a Mag. Judge; 3)Discovery disputes to be resolved in following manner: (1)Parties to meet/confer in an attempt to resolve disputes; (2)If unable to resolve disputes, they shall attempt to resolve their disagreement by telephone conference w/Mag. Judge; 3)If still unable to resolve their disputes, they may file appropriate written motions with the court. Signed by Judge David L. Bunning on 01/13/2011.(KRB)cc: COR
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $400; receipt number 0643-4479093), filed by Timothy L. Harmeling. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(KRB) |
| Conflict Check run. (KRB) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Harmeling v. Monsanto Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Timothy L. Harmeling | |
| Represented By: | Jennifer A. Moore |
| Represented By: | Ashton Rose Smith |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Monsanto Company | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
