Eads v. Bishop
Plaintiff: Joyce Eads
Defendant: Bryan N. Bishop
Case Number: 2:2020cv00124
Filed: September 2, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Presiding Judge: William O Bertelsman
Referring Judge: Candace J Smith
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 16, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER: That the parties shall file a proposed agreed order of dismissal of this action or a Rule 41 compliant stipulation of dismissal by November 16, 2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Candace J. Smith on 10/16/2020.(ECO)cc: COR
October 16, 2020 ***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Candace J. Smith for review: #8 Notice of Settlement (ECO)
October 15, 2020 Filing 8 NOTICE of Settlement by Joyce Eads (Lawson, James)
October 7, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 AGREED ORDER: That Bryan N. Bishop, Attorney at Law PLLC shall have up to and including October 21, 2020, to respond to the complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Candace J. Smith on 10/7/2020. (ECO)cc: COR
September 30, 2020 Filing 6 Proposed Agreed Order by Bryan N. Bishop. (Moad, Jeffrey)
September 30, 2020 Filing 5 FRCP 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Bryan N. Bishop. (Moad, Jeffrey)
September 30, 2020 ***MOTION SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Candace J. Smith for review: re #6 Proposed Agreed Order by Bryan N. Bishop (ECO)
September 2, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 STANDING REFERRAL ORDER: 1) Case referred to presiding Magistrate Judge to supervise discovery and pretrial proceedings; 2) Magistrate Judge is authorized to conduct all pretrial and status conferences, hold hearings as required, and rule on nondispositive motions. Dispositive motions and motions in limine will be referred by the Clerk of court to the undersigned. Subject to other provisions of law, the final pretrial conference and trial will be before the undersigned, unless the parties agree to a trial by a Magistrate Judge, pursuant to 28 USC 636(c). Signed by Judge William O. Bertelsman on 6/18/2010.(ECO)cc: COR
September 2, 2020 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Bryan N. Bishop ; Summons issued and returned to counsel electronically (ECO)
September 2, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT and Demand for Jury Trial ( Filing fee $400; receipt number 0643-4765738), filed by Joyce Eads. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Regency Note, #2 Exhibit B-Collection Complaint, #3 Exhibit C-Motion for Default, #4 Exhibit D-Default Judgment, #5 Summons to Bryan N. Bishop, #6 Civil Cover Sheet)(ECO)
September 2, 2020 Conflict Check run. (ECO)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Eads v. Bishop
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joyce Eads
Represented By: James Hays Lawson
Represented By: James R. McKenzie
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bryan N. Bishop
Represented By: Matthew W. Breetz
Represented By: Jeffrey Steven Moad
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?