Schreiner v. Wild Flavors, Inc.
Plaintiff: Darrick C. Schreiner
Defendant: Wild Flavors, Inc. and ADM Wild Flavors
Case Number: 2:2021cv00025
Filed: February 23, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Presiding Judge: Edward B Atkins
Referring Judge: David L Bunning
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 et
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 9, 2021 Filing 8 FRCP 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Wild Flavors, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Archer-Daniels-Midland Company for Wild Flavors, Inc... (Carter, John)
April 2, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER FOR MEETING AND REPORT: (1) Within twenty-one (21) days from the date of the entry of this Order, the parties, by counsel, shall meet, either in person or by telephone, to discuss the nature and basis of their claims and defenses, and the possibilities for a prompt settlement or resolution of the case, to make or arrange for the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and to develop a proposed discovery plan. See FED. R. CIV. P. 26(f). (2) Within ten (10) days after the meeting, the parties shall file a joint status report containing: (a) the proposed discovery plan; (b) the parties' estimate of the time necessary to file pretrial motions; (c) the parties' belief as to whether the matter is suitable for some form of alternative dispute resolution such as mediation; (d) the parties' estimate as to the probable length of trial; and (e) whether the parties will consent to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge (Atkins) for all further proceedings, including trial, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c). Consent forms are attached to this Order and forms signed by all parties' counsel should be filed no later than the date counsels' joint status report is due. If all parties, by counsel, so consent, the Clerk of Court shall reassign this matter to the appropriate Magistrate Judge without the necessity of further order of the Court. L.R. 73.1(c). (3) Should the parties find that a joint report is not possible, the parties shall each file individual reports, which the Court shall entertain for the purposes of setting out its Scheduling Order or other appropriate Orders. Signed by Judge David L. Bunning on 4/2/2021. (Attachments: #1 Consent to Magistrate Judge)(ECO)cc: COR
April 1, 2021 Filing 6 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY RE: FAILURE TO FILE FRCP 7.1 DISCLOSURES to counsel of record, John Carter. #4 Answer to Complaint has been filed by Wild Flavors, Inc. without the required Rule 7.1 Disclosure statement. Rule 7.1 Disclosures must be filed within fourteen (14) calendar days. Failure to file the Disclosure Statement will cause the case to be submitted to the presiding judge for further action. cc: COR (ECO)
April 1, 2021 Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Wild Flavors, Inc..(Carter, John)
April 1, 2021 Filing 4 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Wild Flavors, Inc..(Carter, John)
April 1, 2021 ***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of David L. Bunning for review: #4 Answer to Complaint (ECO)
February 24, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 STANDING REFERRAL ORDER: 1) Case referred to assigned U.S. Magistrate Judge at Covington to supervise discovery and pretrial proceedings; 2) Magistrate Judge is authorized to conduct all pretrial and status conferences, to hold such hearings as may be required, and to rule on nondispositive motions, except motions in limine. Dispositive motions and motions in limine will be referred to the undersigned. The final pretrial conference and trial will also be before the undersigned, unless parties agree to a trial by a Magistrate Judge; 3) Discovery disputes shall be resolved in the following manner: (1) Parties to meet/confer in an attempt to resolve disputes; (2) If parties unable to resolve such disputes formally, they shall attempt to resolve their disagreements by telephone conference with the Magistrate Judge; 3) If parties unable to resolve their disputes after conference with the Magistrate Judge, they may file appropriate written motions with the Court, which shall include the certification required. Signed by Judge David L. Bunning on 1/13/2011.(ECO)cc: COR
February 24, 2021 Conflict Check run. (ECO)
February 23, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT (NO PROCESS REQUESTED). ( Filing fee $402; receipt number 0643-4903595), filed by Darrick C. Schreiner. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(ECO)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Schreiner v. Wild Flavors, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wild Flavors, Inc.
Represented By: John Michael S. Carter
Represented By: J. Andrew Inman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ADM Wild Flavors
Represented By: John Michael S. Carter
Represented By: J. Andrew Inman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Darrick C. Schreiner
Represented By: Robert L. Thompson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?