Hines v. Archer Daniels Midland Company
| Roderick Hines |
| Archer Daniels Midland Company |
| 2:2021cv00085 |
| July 12, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| Edward B Atkins |
| William O Bertelsman |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER: Plaintiff shall file an amended complaint on or before 9/10/2021. Signed by Judge William O. Bertelsman on 8/24/2021.(TJZ)cc: COR
|
|
Filing 10
RESPONSE in Opposition re #6 MOTION to Dismiss for failure to state a claim by Archer Daniels Midland Company filed by Roderick Hines. (Wilbekin, Erik)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER: That plaintiff's motion #7 be, and is hereby, GRANTED. Plaintiff shall have until August 20, 2021 to file a response to defendant's motion to dismiss #6 . Signed by Judge William O. Bertelsman on 7/29/2021.(ECO)cc: COR
|
|
Filing 8
RESPONSE to Motion re #7 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply filed by Archer Daniels Midland Company. (Carter, John)
|
|
NOTICE OF DOCKET MODIFICATION TO Erik Wilbekin re #7 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer; Error 1: the incorrect event/motion relief "to Answer" was selected. Entry by Attorney; Clerk re-defined the document as a Motion for Extension of time to File Response/Reply. No further action required by counsel as to Error 1. Error 2: a link was not created to the related document. Entry by attorney; Clerk modified the entry to create the link; In the future, create a link to the related document. No further action required by counsel as to Error 2. cc: COR (ECO)
|
|
Filing 7
FIRST MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re #6 Motion to Dismiss for failure to state a claim by Roderick Hines Motions referred to Edward B. Atkins. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order [PROPOSED ORDER)(Wilbekin, Erik) Modified to correct event and text and created a link to the motion on 7/27/2021 (ECO).
|
|
Filing 6
MOTION to Dismiss for failure to state a claim by Archer Daniels Midland Company (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion to Dismiss, #2 Exhibit 1 - EEOC Charge, #3 Exhibit 2 - EEOC Dismissal and Notice of Rights, #4 Proposed Order)(Carter, John)
|
|
Filing 5
FRCP 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Archer Daniels Midland Company. (Carter, John)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY RE: FAILURE TO FILE FRCP 7.1 DISCLOSURES to counsel of record, Jay Inman. #1 Notice of Removal, has been filed by Archer Daniels Midland Company without the required Rule 7.1 Disclosure statement. Rule 7.1 Disclosures must be filed within fourteen (14) calendar days. Failure to file the Disclosure Statement will cause the case to be submitted to the presiding judge for further action. cc: COR (ECO)
|
|
Filing 3
STANDING REFERRAL ORDER: 1) Case referred to presiding Magistrate Judge to supervise discovery and pretrial proceedings; 2) Magistrate Judge is authorized to conduct all pretrial and status conferences, hold hearings as required, and rule on nondispositive motions. Dispositive motions and motions in limine will be referred by the Clerk of court to the undersigned. Subject to other provisions of law, the final pretrial conference and trial will be before the undersigned, unless the parties agree to a trial by a Magistrate Judge, pursuant to 28 USC 636(c). Signed by Judge William O. Bertelsman on 6/18/2010.(ECO)cc: COR
|
|
Conflict Check run. (ECO)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Kenton Circuit Court, case number 21-CI-00890. ( Filing fee $402; receipt number 0643-5014624), filed by Archer Daniels Midland Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex. 1-State Court Record, #2 Exhibit Ex. 2-Unaccepted Stipulation, #3 Exhibit Ex. 3-Correspondence between Counsel, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(ECO)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hines v. Archer Daniels Midland Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Roderick Hines | |
| Represented By: | Erik J. Wilbekin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Archer Daniels Midland Company | |
| Represented By: | J. Andrew Inman |
| Represented By: | John Michael S. Carter |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
