Davis v. Hall et al
Plaintiff: Jewel Davis
Defendant: Ryan Hall and Directional Technology Solutions, LLP
3Rd Party Defendant: John Doe
Case Number: 2:2022cv00027
Filed: March 2, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Presiding Judge: David L Bunning
Referring Judge: Candace J Smith
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 6, 2022 Filing 13 THIRD PARTY COMPLAINT against John Doe, filed by Directional Technology Solutions, LLP, Ryan Hall. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-Police Report, #2 Exhibit 2-Affidavit of Counsel)(ECO)
April 6, 2022 Filing 12 MINUTE ENTRY ORDER FOR MOTION HEARING held on 4/6/2022 before Magistrate Judge Candace J. Smith: IT IS ORDERED as follows: 1. The Motion for Joinder #8 is hereby taken under advisement. Defendants shall have thirty (30) days from the date of this Conference, the same being not later than Friday, May 6, 2022, to file a supplemental memorandum in support of their Motion for Joinder #8 . Upon the filing of said supplemental memorandum or upon expiration of the time to do so, whichever first occurs, the Motion for Joinder #8 shall then be submitted for adjudication. 2. Defendants' Motion for Leave to File Third-Party Complaint #7 is hereby granted. The Clerk shall file the tendered Third-Party Complaint ( #7 -1) in the record.3. Defendants' companion Motion for Warning Order Attorney #7 as to Third-Party Defendant John Doe is also hereby granted. A separate order will be issued regarding the specifics for the warning order attorney appointment. (Tape #KYED-COV 2-22-cv-27-DLB-CJS 20220406 111117.) Signed by Candace J. Smith. (ECO)cc: COR
April 6, 2022 Party John Doe added. (ECO)
March 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER: That Defendants' Motion for Leave to File Third-Party Complaint and for Warning Order Attorney #7 and Defendants' Motion for Joinder #8 are hereby scheduled for a telephonic Motion Conference on Wednesday, April 6, 2022, at 11:30 a.m. EDT before the undersigned. Counsel shall connect to the conference five minutes before the call is scheduled to begin. To connect to the call (See Order for Details). Signed by Magistrate Judge Candace J. Smith on 3/29/2022.(ECO)cc: COR
March 28, 2022 ***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of David L. Bunning for review: #10 Report of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (SLG)
March 25, 2022 Filing 10 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Metzger, Edward)
March 11, 2022 Filing 9 NOTICE by Directional Technology Solutions, LLP, Ryan Hall re #1 Notice of Removal, Notice of Amendment (Metzger, Edward)
March 11, 2022 Filing 8 MOTION for Joinder by Directional Technology Solutions, LLP, Ryan Hall to Join Sally Johnston as Plaintiff Motions referred to Candace J. Smith. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Police Report, #2 Proposed Order)(Metzger, Edward)
March 11, 2022 Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to File by Directional Technology Solutions, LLP, Ryan Hall Third Party Complaint Motions referred to Candace J. Smith. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Proposed Third Party Complaint, #2 Exhibit Police Report, #3 Exhibit Affidavit of Counsel, #4 Proposed Order)(Metzger, Edward)
March 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER FOR MEETING AND REPORT: Within twenty-one (21) days from the date of the entry of this Order, the parties, by counsel, shall meet, either in person or by telephone, to discuss the nature and basis of their claims and defenses, and the possibilities for a prompt settlement or resolution of the case, to make or arrange for the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and to develop a proposed discovery plan. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f). Within ten (10) days after the meeting, the parties shall file a joint status report. (See Order for Details) Signed by Judge David L. Bunning on 03/08/2022. (Attachments: #1 MJ Consent Form)(SLG)cc: COR
March 4, 2022 ***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of David L. Bunning for review: Answer to Complaint (ECO)
March 3, 2022 Filing 5 FRCP 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Directional Technology Solutions, LLP. (Metzger, Edward)
March 2, 2022 Filing 4 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY RE: FAILURE TO FILE FRCP 7.1 DISCLOSURES to counsel of record, Edward Metzger. Answer to Complaint has been filed by Directional Technology Solutions, LLP without the required Rule 7.1 Disclosure statement. Rule 7.1 Disclosures must be filed within fourteen (14) calendar days. Failure to file the Disclosure Statement will cause the case to be submitted to the presiding judge for further action. cc: COR (ECO)
March 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 STANDING REFERRAL ORDER: 1) Case referred to assigned U.S. Magistrate Judge at Covington to supervise discovery and pretrial proceedings; 2) Magistrate Judge is authorized to conduct all pretrial and status conferences, to hold such hearings as may be required, and to rule on nondispositive motions, except motions in limine. Dispositive motions and motions in limine will be referred by the Clerk of this court to the undersigned. The final pretrial conference and trial will also be before the undersigned, unless parties agree to a trial by a Magistrate Judge; 3) Discovery disputes shall be resolved in the following manner: (1) Parties to meet/confer in an attempt to resolve disputes; (2) If parties unable to resolve such disputes formally, they shall attempt to resolve their disagreements by telephone conference with the Magistrate Judge; 3) If parties unable to resolve their disputes after conference with the Magistrate Judge, they may file appropriate written motions with the Court, which shall include the certification required. Signed by Judge David L. Bunning on 1/13/2011.(ECO)cc: COR
March 2, 2022 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Boone Circuit Court, case number 22-CI-00115. ( Filing fee $402; receipt number AKYEDC-5205292), filed by Ryan Hall, Directional Technology Solutions, LLP. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 State Court Record)(ECO)
March 2, 2022 Conflict Check run. (ECO)
March 2, 2022 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Directional Technology Solutions, LLP, Ryan Hall. (Answer filed as part of State Court Record DE #1 Attachment #2).(ECO)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Davis v. Hall et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jewel Davis
Represented By: Richard Wade Hartsock
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ryan Hall
Represented By: Edward L. Metzger, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Directional Technology Solutions, LLP
Represented By: Edward L. Metzger, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
3rd party defendant: John Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?