Jones v. Hughs et al
Terry Jones |
Craig Hughs, Daniel Cameron and Commonwealth of Kentucky |
2:2022cv00034 |
March 16, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
David L Bunning |
Candace J Smith |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Craig Hughs. (Barry, Mark) |
Filing 5 IMPORTANT NOTICE to Pro Se Filer: Information relating to pro se filings and F.R.Civ.P. 5.2 requiring personal identifiers be partially redacted from documents filed with the court. #Click here for more information on the rules. It is the sole responsibility of counsel and the parties to comply with the rules requiring redaction of personal data identifiers.cc: pro se filer via U.S. Mail (Attachments: #1 sample page)(TJZ) |
***MOTION SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Candace J. Smith for review: re #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Terry Jones (TJZ) |
Conflict Check run. (TJZ) |
Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Terry Jones. (TJZ) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Terry Jones (TJZ) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Terry Jones. (Attachments: #1 Attachments-State Court Record, #2 envelope)(TJZ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.