Smith et al v. Kuroki et al
Plaintiff: Colin Blair Smith and Jerome Smith
Defendant: Yohei Kuroki and Mitsui Sumitomo Marine Management (U.S.A.) Inc.
Case Number: 2:2022cv00037
Filed: March 18, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Presiding Judge: Edward B Atkins
Referring Judge: William O Bertelsman
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 14 INITIAL DISCLOSURES by Yohei Kuroki.(Farah, Licha)
June 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 DISCLOSURES Initial Disclosures by Colin Blair Smith.(Nageleisen, Donald)
June 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 INITIAL DISCLOSURES RULE 26(a)(1) DISCLOSURES by Mitsui Sumitomo Marine Management (U.S.A.) Inc..(Whittington, Alexandria)
May 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 NOTICE by Yohei Kuroki of Service (Farah, Licha)
May 5, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 NOTICE by Colin Blair Smith of Service of Plaintiffs' Interrogatories, Requests for Production of Documents and Requests for Admissions to Defendant Yohei Kuroki (Nageleisen, Donald)
April 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 SCHEDULING ORDER: Proposed Agreed Scheduling Order #8 , the Court ADOPTS the following schedule for the disposition of this case: 1. The parties shall exchange Rule 26(a)(1) disclosures by June 1, 2022. 2. All fact discovery shall be completed on or before April 3, 2023. 3. No later than June 14, 2023, the plaintiffs shall disclose the identity of expert witnesses who may be used at trial, accompanied by written reports. 4. The parties shall file any motion to join parties or amend pleadings by May 15, 2023. 5. No later than October 2, 2023, counsel for the parties shall complete all all expert discovery. 6. A status report is due no later than October 2, 2023 (close of discovery). 7. The parties shall have to and including October 6, 2023, by which to file all dispositive and Daubert motions. 8. Requests to modify any dates or deadlines established by this order shall be submitted upon motion filed prior to expiration of the deadline in question, and upon showing of good cause beyond the control of counsel in the exercise of due diligence. (See order for details) Signed by Magistrate Judge Edward B. Atkins on 04/25/2022.(SLG)cc: COR
April 25, 2022 Opinion or Order ***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Edward B. Atkins for review: #8 Joint Scheduling Order by Mitsui Sumitomo Marine Management (U.S.A.) Inc. (SLG)
April 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Proposed Agreed Order Regarding Discovery Deadlines by Mitsui Sumitomo Marine Management (U.S.A.) Inc.. (Miller, Donald)
April 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Mitsui Sumitomo Marine Management (U.S.A.) Inc.. (Whittington, Alexandria)
March 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 SECOND ANSWER to Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint (DE #1 at Exhibit F) with Jury Demand by Mitsui Sumitomo Marine Management (U.S.A.) Inc..(Miller, Donald) Modified text to better describe document on 3/28/2022 (ECO).
March 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER: That by FRIDAY, April 22, 2022, each party shall prepare and submit to the undersigned a proposed scheduling and discovery plan. The proposed scheduling and discovery plain shall discuss the following matters: (See a thru f). Signed by Magistrate Judge Edward B. Atkins on 3/23/2022.(ECO)cc: COR
March 23, 2022 Opinion or Order NOTICE FOR ATTORNEY TO UPDATE ADDRESS to Donald L. Miller: It appears the address listed on your filing #1 Notice of Removal is different than the address registered with our Court. Pursuant to the Court's Administrative Policies and Procedures governing ECF, a request to update your address must be processed through your PACER account. Please visit the Court's website at www.kyed.uscourts.gov for information or contact the Help Desk at 1-866-485-6349. cc: COR (ECO)
March 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 STANDING REFERRAL ORDER: 1) Case referred to presiding Magistrate Judge to supervise discovery and pretrial proceedings; 2) Magistrate Judge is authorized to conduct all pretrial and status conferences, hold hearings as required, and rule on nondispositive motions. Dispositive motions and motions in limine will be referred by the Clerk of court to the undersigned. Subject to other provisions of law, the final pretrial conference and trial will be before the undersigned, unless the parties agree to a trial by a Magistrate Judge, pursuant to 28 USC 636(c). Signed by Judge William O. Bertelsman on 6/18/2010.(ECO)cc: COR
March 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Conflict Check run. (ECO)
March 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 FRCP 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Mitsui Sumitomo Marine Management (U.S.A.) Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Mitsui Sumitomo Marine (U.S.A.), Inc., Other Affiliate Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance Company Limited, Other Affiliate MS & AD Insurance Group Holdings, Inc., Other Affiliate MSIG Holdings (U.S.A.), Inc., Other Affiliate Aioi Nissay Dowa Insurance Company Limited for Mitsui Sumitomo Marine Management (U.S.A.) Inc. (ECO) Modified to correct filed date on 3/21/2022 (ECO).
March 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Kenton Circuit Court, case number 20-CI-00753. ( Filing fee $402; receipt number AKYEDC-5220311), filed by Mitsui Sumitomo Marine Management (U.S.A.) Inc., Yohei Kuroki. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A- State Court Complaint, #2 Exhibit B-State Court Notice to Dismiss for Lack of Prosecution, #3 Exhibit C-State Court Order Dismissing for Lack of Prosecution, #4 Exhibit D-State Court Motion to Alter, Amend or Vacate Judgment, #5 Exhibit E-State Court Order Granting Motion to Alter Amend or Vacate, #6 Exhibit F-State Court First Amended Complaint, #7 Exhibit G-State Court Requests for Admission, #8 Exhibit H-Consent to Removal, #9 Exhibit I-State Court Clerk's Notation of Docket, #10 Civil Cover Sheet, #11 Notice of Removal)(ECO)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Smith et al v. Kuroki et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Colin Blair Smith
Represented By: Donald L. Nageleisen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jerome Smith
Represented By: Donald L. Nageleisen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Yohei Kuroki
Represented By: Licha H. Farah, Jr.
Represented By: Whitney Nikole Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mitsui Sumitomo Marine Management (U.S.A.) Inc.
Represented By: Donald L. Miller, II
Represented By: Alexandria C. Whittington
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?