Johnston v. Directional Technology Solutions, LLP et al
Plaintiff: Sally Johnston
Defendant: Directional Technology Solutions, LLP and Ryan Hall
Case Number: 2:2022cv00050
Filed: April 14, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Presiding Judge: David L Bunning
Referring Judge: Candace J Smith
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Auto Negligence
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 10, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 VIRTUAL ORDER: granting #7 MOTION for Mark Troyan to Appear Pro Hac Vice as co-counsel for Plaintiff Sally Johnston, the requirements of Joint Local Civil Rule 83.2 having been satisfied. Signed by Magistrate Judge Candace J. Smith on 6/10/2022. (TJZ)cc: COR and Mark Troyan by US Mail
June 10, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 VIRTUAL ORDER: granting #6 MOTION for Robert N. Peirce, III to Appear Pro Hac Vice as co-counsel for Plaintiff Sally Johnston, the requirements of Joint Local Civil Rule 83.2 having been satisfied. Signed by Magistrate Judge Candace J. Smith on 6/10/2022. (TJZ)cc: COR and Robert N. Peirce, III by US Mail
June 10, 2022 NOTICE FOR ATTORNEY TO REQUEST E-Filing Privileges to Mark Troyan: re 13 Order on Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. A Pro Hac Vice e-Filing request must be processed through your PACER account. IMPORTANT NOTICE: You are required to electronically file and receive electronic service from the court's automated Electronic Case Filing (ECF) system. If you are not a registered Filing User for the Court's ECF system, please visit the Court's website at www.kyed.uscourts.gov for information and/or training. For additional assistance contact the Help Desk at 1-866-485-6349. cc: COR and via U.S. Mail to Mark Troyan (TJZ)
June 10, 2022 NOTICE FOR ATTORNEY TO REQUEST E-Filing Privileges to Robert N. Peirce, III: re 12 Order on Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. A Pro Hac Vice e-Filing request must be processed through your PACER account. IMPORTANT NOTICE: You are required to electronically file and receive electronic service from the court's automated Electronic Case Filing (ECF) system. If you are not a registered Filing User for the Court's ECF system, please visit the Court's website at www.kyed.uscourts.gov for information and/or training. For additional assistance contact the Help Desk at 1-866-485-6349. cc: COR and via U.S. Mail to Robert N. Peirce, III (TJZ)
June 9, 2022 Filing 11 NOTICE by Sally Johnston re #6 MOTION for Robert N. Peirce, III to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Sally Johnston ( Filing fee $125; receipt number AKYEDC-5283015) (Turner, James)
June 9, 2022 Filing 10 NOTICE by Sally Johnston re #7 MOTION for Mark Troyan to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Sally Johnston ( Filing fee $125; receipt number AKYEDC-5283022) Supp Motion and Affidavit (Turner, James)
June 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 VIRTUAL ORDER: taking under advisement #7 MOTION for Mark Troyan to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Sally Johnston, pending counsel's filing of a supplement addressing the deficiency in his application. The Joint Local Civil Rule requires applicants for pro hac vice admission to disclose "whether the attorney is currently OR HAS EVER BEEN disbarred, suspended from practice, or subject to other disciplinary action by any court, state, territory, or the District of Columbia." LR 83.2(a)(2) (emphasis added). In the pending application, Attorney Troyan states only that he is "not currently" disbarred, suspended from practice, etc. Thus, more is required to comply with the Local Rule and appropriately inform the Court before his application can be granted. Signed by Magistrate Judge Candace J. Smith on 6/8/2022.(TJZ)cc: COR, Mark Troyan via US Mail
June 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 VIRTUAL ORDER: taking under advisement #6 MOTION for Robert N. Peirce, III to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Sally Johnston, pending counsel's filing of a supplement addressing the deficiency in his application. The Joint Local Civil Rule requires applicants for pro hac vice admission to disclose "whether the attorney is currently OR HAS EVER BEEN disbarred, suspended from practice, or subject to other disciplinary action by any court, state, territory, or the District of Columbia." LR 83.2(a)(2) (emphasis added). In the pending application, Attorney Peirce states only that he is "not currently" disbarred, suspended from practice, etc. Thus, more is required to comply with the Local Rule and appropriately inform the Court before his application can be granted. Signed by Magistrate Judge Candace J. Smith on 6/8/2022.(TJZ)cc: COR, Robert N. Peirce, III via US Mail
June 7, 2022 ***MOTION SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Candace J. Smith for review: re #7 MOTION for Mark Troyan to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Sally Johnston ( Filing fee $125; receipt number AKYEDC-5283022), #6 MOTION for Robert N. Peirce, III to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Sally Johnston ( Filing fee $125; receipt number AKYEDC-5283015) (TJZ)
June 7, 2022 BAR STATUS Check completed re #7 MOTION for Mark Troyan to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Sally Johnston ( Filing fee $125; receipt number AKYEDC-5283022), #6 MOTION for Robert N. Peirce, III to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Sally Johnston ( Filing fee $125; receipt number AKYEDC-5283015). (TJZ)
June 6, 2022 Filing 7 MOTION for Mark Troyan to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Sally Johnston ( Filing fee $125; receipt number AKYEDC-5283022)Motions referred to Candace J. Smith. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Turner, James)
June 6, 2022 Filing 6 MOTION for Robert N. Peirce, III to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Sally Johnston ( Filing fee $125; receipt number AKYEDC-5283015)Motions referred to Candace J. Smith. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Turner, James)
May 4, 2022 ***MOTION SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Candace J. Smith for review: re #5 UNOPPOSED MOTION to Consolidate Cases by Directional Technology Solutions, LLP, Ryan Hall (TJZ)
May 3, 2022 Filing 5 UNOPPOSED MOTION to Consolidate Cases by Directional Technology Solutions, LLP, Ryan Hall Motions referred to Candace J. Smith. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Metzger, Edward)
April 14, 2022 Filing 4 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY RE: FAILURE TO FILE FRCP 7.1 DISCLOSURES to counsel of record, Edward L. Metzger, III. #1 Notice of Removal, has been filed by Directional Technology Solutions, LLP without the required Rule 7.1 Disclosure statement. Rule 7.1 Disclosures must be filed within fourteen (14) calendar days. Failure to file the Disclosure Statement will cause the case to be submitted to the presiding judge for further action. cc: COR (TJZ)
April 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 STANDING REFERRAL ORDER: 1) Case referred to assigned U.S. Magistrate Judge at Covington to supervise discovery and pretrial proceedings; 2) Magistrate Judge is authorized to conduct all pretrial and status conferences, to hold such hearings as may be required, and to rule on nondispositive motions, except motions in limine. Dispositive motions and motions in limine will be referred to the undersigned. The FPT and trial will also be before the undersigned, unless parties agree to a trial by a Magistrate Judge; 3) Discovery disputes shall be resolved in the following manner: (1) Parties to meet to resolve disputes; (2) If parties unable to resolve such disputes formally, they shall attempt to resolve their disagreements by telephone conference with the Magistrate Judge; 3) If parties unable to resolve their disputes after conference with the Magistrate Judge, they may file appropriate motions. Signed by Judge David L. Bunning on 1/13/2011.(TJZ)cc: COR
April 14, 2022 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Boone Circuit Court, case number 22-CI-426. ( Filing fee $402; receipt number AKYEDC-5242849), filed by Ryan Hall, Directional Technology Solutions, LLP. (Attachments: #1 State Court Record, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(TJZ)
April 14, 2022 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Directional Technology Solutions, LLP, Ryan Hall, filed in state court record.(TJZ)
April 14, 2022 Clerk's Note: re #4 Notice of Deficiency re: Rule 7.1 Disclosures. Counsel advised that disclosure filed as part of Notice of Removal. No further action required by counsel. (TJZ)
April 14, 2022 ***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of David L. Bunning for review: Answer to Complaint (TJZ)
April 14, 2022 Conflict Check run. (TJZ)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Johnston v. Directional Technology Solutions, LLP et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sally Johnston
Represented By: James Ryan Turner
Represented By: Mark D. Troyan
Represented By: Robert N. Peirce, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Directional Technology Solutions, LLP
Represented By: Edward L. Metzger, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ryan Hall
Represented By: Edward L. Metzger, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?