Krauss-Maffei Corporation v. Lepp et al
| Krauss-Maffei Corporation |
| Klaus Lepp, Marcela Velez Lepp and The Plast Pro's, LLC |
| 2:2022cv00117 |
| September 28, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| Edward B Atkins |
| David L Bunning |
| Defend Trade Secrets Act (of 2016) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER: that this matter be, and it is, hereby reassigned to the Honorable David L. Bunning, Judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky. Signed by Judge William O. Bertelsman on 9/29/2022.(ECO)cc: COR
|
|
Filing 5
MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order by Krauss-Maffei Corporation and Memorandum in Support (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Order Granting Plaintiff's Motion For Temporary Restraining Order, #2 Exhibit A - Employment Agreement, #3 Exhibit B - The Plast Pro's LLC - Florida LLC, #4 Exhibit C - Emails from Mr. Lepp containing confidential drawings, #5 Exhibit D - Emails that Mr. Lepp sent from his work email to his home email containing confidential information, #6 Exhibit E - Plast Pros August 22, 2022 Invoice, #7 Exhibit F - Cease and Desist Letter dated August 22, 2022 to Mr. Lepp)(Mattingly, Michael)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY RE: FAILURE TO FILE FRCP 7.1 DISCLOSURES to counsel of record, Michael Mattingly. #1 Complaint, has been filed by Krauss-Maffei Corporation without the required Rule 7.1 Disclosure statement. Rule 7.1 Disclosures must be filed within fourteen (14) calendar days. Failure to file the Disclosure Statement will cause the case to be submitted to the presiding judge for further action. cc: COR (ECO)
|
|
Filing 3
STANDING REFERRAL ORDER: 1) Case referred to presiding Magistrate Judge to supervise discovery and pretrial proceedings; 2) Magistrate Judge is authorized to conduct all pretrial and status conferences, hold hearings as required, and rule on nondispositive motions. Dispositive motions and motions in limine will be referred by the Clerk of court to the undersigned. Subject to other provisions of law, the final pretrial conference and trial will be before the undersigned, unless the parties agree to a trial by a Magistrate Judge, pursuant to 28 USC 636(c) Signed by Judge William O. Bertelsman on 6/18/2010.(ECO)cc: COR
|
|
Conflict Check run. (ECO)
|
|
NOTICE FOR ATTORNEY TO UPDATE ADDRESS to Matthew J. Bakota: It appears the address listed on your filing #1 Complaint, is different than the address registered with our Court. Pursuant to the Court's Administrative Policies and Procedures governing ECF, a request to update your address must be processed through your PACER account. Please visit the Court's website at www.kyed.uscourts.gov for information or contact the Help Desk at 1-866-485-6349. cc: COR (ECO)
|
|
***MOTION SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of David L. Bunning for review: re #5 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order by Krauss-Maffei Corporation and Memorandum in Support (SLG)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT (NO PROCESS REQUESTED). ( Filing fee $402; receipt number AKYEDC-5374948), filed by Krauss-Maffei Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A-Employment Agreement, #3 Exhibit B-The Plast Pro's LLC-Florida LLC, #4 Exhibit C-Emails from Mr. Leep, #5 Exhibit D-Emails Mr. Leep Sent, #6 Exhibit E-Plast Pros 8/22/22 Invoice, #7 Exhibit F-Cease and Desist Letter dated 8/22/2022 to Mr. Lepp, #8 Exhibit G-Letter to Krauss-Maffei)(ECO)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
