Adams et al v. Ethos Holding Corp. et al
| Timothy R. Adams and Todd R. Bladel |
| Ethos Holding Corp., Ethos Property Holdings, LLC and Ethos Research & Development LLC |
| 2:2022cv00126 |
| October 13, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| Edward B Atkins |
| David L Bunning |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 17
ORDER FOR MEETING AND REPORT: (1) Within twenty-one (21) days from the date of the entry of this Order, the parties, or, if represented by counsel, through their counsel, shall meet, either in person or by telephone, to discuss the nature and basis of their claims and defenses, and the possibilities for a prompt settlement or resolution of the case, and to develop a proposed discovery plan. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f)(3). (2) Within ten (10) days after the meeting, the parties shall file a joint status report containing: (a-e SEE ORDER)(3) Should the parties find that a joint report is not possible, the parties shall each file individual reports which the Court shall entertain for the purposes of setting out its Scheduling Order or other appropriate Order. Signed by Judge David L. Bunning on 12/9/2022. (Attachments: #1 MJ Consent Form) (TDB)cc: COR
|
| ***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of David L. Bunning for review: #15 Answer to Complaint, Counterclaim (TDB) |
| Filing 16 FRCP 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Ethos Holding Corp., Ethos Property Holdings, LLC, Ethos Research & Development LLC. (Truitt, Nathaniel) |
| Filing 15 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, with Jury Demand , COUNTERCLAIM against Timothy R. Adams, Todd R. Bladel by Ethos Research & Development LLC, Ethos Property Holdings, LLC, Ethos Holding Corp..(Truitt, Nathaniel) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Ethos Holding Corp., Ethos Property Holdings, LLC, Ethos Research & Development LLC. (Nitardy, Michael) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Ethos Holding Corp., Ethos Property Holdings, LLC, Ethos Research & Development LLC. (Truitt, Nathaniel) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER: that the motions #7 and #8 are GRANTED, and James E. Burke and Carson E. Miller be and are hereby admitted to practice pro hac vice for all purposes in the above-styled action. Signed by Magistrate Judge Edward B. Atkins on 10/17/2022. (TDB)cc: COR and Carson E. Miller by US Mail
|
| Filing 11 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Timothy R. Adams, Todd R. Bladel. Ethos Research & Development LLC waiver sent on 10/13/2022, answer due 12/12/2022. (Burton, Amanda) |
| Filing 10 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Timothy R. Adams, Todd R. Bladel. Ethos Property Holdings, LLC waiver sent on 10/13/2022, answer due 12/12/2022. (Burton, Amanda) |
| Filing 9 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Timothy R. Adams, Todd R. Bladel. Ethos Holding Corp. waiver sent on 10/13/2022, answer due 12/12/2022. (Burton, Amanda) |
| NOTICE FOR ATTORNEY TO REQUEST E-Filing Privileges to Carson E. Miller: re #12 Order on Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice,,,. A Pro Hac Vice e-Filing request must be processed through your PACER account. IMPORTANT NOTICE: You are required to electronically file and receive electronic service from the court's automated Electronic Case Filing (ECF) system. If you are not a registered Filing User for the Court's ECF system, please visit the Court's website at www.kyed.uscourts.gov for information and/or training. For additional assistance contact the Help Desk at 1-866-485-6349. cc: COR and via U.S. Mail to Carson E. Miller (TDB) |
| ***MOTION SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Edward B. Atkins for review: re #7 MOTION for James E. Burke to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Timothy R. Adams, Todd R. Bladel ( Filing fee $125; receipt number AKYEDC-5387822), #8 MOTION for Carson E. Miller to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Timothy R. Adams, Todd R. Bladel ( Filing fee $125; receipt number AKYEDC-5387982) (TDB) |
| BAR STATUS Check completed as to James E. Burke re #7 MOTION for James E. Burke to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Timothy R. Adams, Todd R. Bladel ( Filing fee $125; receipt number AKYEDC-5387822). (TDB) |
| BAR STATUS Check completed as to Carson E. Miller re #8 MOTION for Carson E. Miller to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Timothy R. Adams, Todd R. Bladel ( Filing fee $125; receipt number AKYEDC-5387982). (TDB) |
| Filing 8 MOTION for Carson E. Miller to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Timothy R. Adams, Todd R. Bladel ( Filing fee $125; receipt number AKYEDC-5387982)Motions referred to Edward B. Atkins. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Affidavit of Carson E. Miller, #2 Exhibit B - Certificate of Good Standing, #3 Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Burton, Amanda) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for James E. Burke to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Timothy R. Adams, Todd R. Bladel ( Filing fee $125; receipt number AKYEDC-5387822)Motions referred to Edward B. Atkins. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Affidavit of James E. Burke, #2 Exhibit B - Certificate of Good Standing, #3 Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Burton, Amanda) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO ATTORNEY Carson E. Miller by Clerk re: L.R. 83 - Attorney Admission procedures w/ a copy of L.R. 83.1 and 83.2 (ECO) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO ATTORNEY James E. Burke by Clerk re: L.R. 83 - Attorney Admission procedures w/ a copy of L.R. 83.1 and 83.2 (ECO) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Ethos Holding Corp., Ethos Property Holdings, LLC, Ethos Research & Development LLC; Summons issued and returned to counsel electronically (ECO) |
|
Filing 3
STANDING REFERRAL ORDER: 1. That this case be, and it is, hereby referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge at Covington to supervise discovery and pretrial proceedings. Unless otherwise ordered by the Court, the case will revert back to the undersigned to hold the final pretrial conference and trial. 2. That, in connection with such reference, the said Magistrate Judge is authorized to conduct all pretrial and status conferences, to hold such hearings as may be required, and to rule on nondispositive motions, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b) (1), except motions in limine. See Brown v. Wesleys Quaker Maid, Inc., 771 F.2d 952 (6th Cir. 1985). Dispositive motions and motions in limine will be referred by the Clerk of this Court to the undersigned. Subject to other provisions of law, the final pretrial conference and trial will also be before the undersigned, unless the parties agree to a trial by a Magistrate Judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c). 3. Discovery disputes shall be resolved in the following manner: (1) Parties shall meet/or confer in an attempt to resolve disputes between themselves, without judicial intervention; (2) if the parties are unable to resolve such disputes informally, they shall attempt to resolve their disagreement by telephone conference with the Magistrate Judge; (3) if, and only if, the parties are unable to resolve their disputes after conference with the Magistrate Judge, they may file appropriate written motions with the Court. Written motions regarding discovery shall include the certification required by Local Rule 37.1. Signed by Judge David L. Bunning on 1/13/2011.(ECO)cc: COR
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $402; receipt number AKYEDC-5386303), filed by Timothy R. Adams, Todd R. Bladel. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Adams Agreement, #2 Exhibit B-Bladell Agreement, #3 Exhibit C-Baseline Agreement, #4 Exhibit D-Allocation Table, #5 Civil Cover Sheet, #6 Summons R&D, #7 Summons Ethos Holding, #8 Summons Properties)(ECO) |
| Conflict Check run. (ECO) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
