Fotohaus, LLC v. Your Choice Wholesale LLC
| Fotohaus, LLC |
| Your Choice Wholesale LLC |
| 2:2022cv00144 |
| November 23, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| William O Bertelsman |
| Candace J Smith |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 501 Copyright Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| BAR STATUS Check completed as to Craig A. Wirth re #14 MOTION for Craig Wirth to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Fotohaus, LLC ( Filing fee $125; receipt number AKYEDC-5450475). (ECO) |
| ***MOTION SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Candace J. Smith for review: re #14 MOTION for Craig Wirth to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Fotohaus, LLC ( Filing fee $125; receipt number AKYEDC-5450475) (ECO) |
| Filing 14 MOTION for Craig Wirth to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Fotohaus, LLC ( Filing fee $125; receipt number AKYEDC-5450475)Motions referred to Candace J. Smith. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Cobb, Joseph) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE OF FILING Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement by Your Choice Wholesale LLC re #10 Answer to Complaint (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 7.1 Disclosure )(Rafizadeh, Mary) Modified text on 1/29/2023 (ECO). |
| Filing 12 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY RE: FAILURE TO FILE FRCP 7.1 DISCLOSURES to counsel of record, Mary Rafizadeh. #10 Answer to Complaint has been filed by Your Choice Wholesale, LLC without the required Rule 7.1 Disclosure statement. Rule 7.1 Disclosures must be filed within fourteen (14) calendar days. Failure to file the Disclosure Statement will cause the case to be submitted to the presiding judge for further action. cc: COR (ECO) |
Filing 11
ORDER: that the parties shall confer no later than January 16, 2023 to consider the nature and basis of their claims and defenses and the possibilities for a prompt settlement or resolution of the case, to make or arrange for the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1), and to develop a proposed discovery plan. Such proposed plan shall be filed no later than January 23,2023. Signed by Judge William O. Bertelsman on 12/29/2022.(ECO)cc: COR
|
| ***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of William O. Bertelsman for review: #10 Answer to Complaint (ECO) |
| ***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Candace J. Smith for review: #6 Notice to Attorney Craig A. Wirth re: L.R. 83 - Attorney Admission procedures w/ a copy of L.R. 83.1 and 83.2 (ECO) |
| Filing 10 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Your Choice Wholesale LLC.(Rafizadeh, Mary) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Fotohaus, LLC via Special Bailiff to Your Choice Wholesale LLC served on 12/10/2022, answer due 1/3/2023. (Cobb, Joseph) |
| Filing 8 FRCP 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Fotohaus, LLC. (Cobb, Joseph) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY RE: FAILURE TO FILE FRCP 7.1 DISCLOSURES to counsel of record, J. Allan Cobb. #1 Complaint has been filed by Fotohaus, LLC without the required Rule 7.1 Disclosure statement. Rule 7.1 Disclosures must be filed within fourteen (14) calendar days. Failure to file the Disclosure Statement will cause the case to be submitted to the presiding judge for further action. cc: COR (TJZ) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO ATTORNEY Craig A. Wirth by Clerk re: L.R. 83 - Attorney Admission procedures w/ a copy of L.R. 83.1 and 83.2 (TJZ) |
| Filing 5 REPORT on the filing or determination of an action regarding cc: form mailed to Copyright Register. (TJZ) |
|
Filing 4
STANDING REFERRAL ORDER: 1) Case referred to presiding Magistrate Judge to supervise discovery and pretrial proceedings; 2) Magistrate Judge is authorized to conduct all pretrial and status conferences, hold hearings is required, and rule on nondispositive motions. Dispositive motions and motions in limine will be referred by the Clerk of court to the undersigned. Subject to other provisions of law, the final pretrial conference and trial will be before the undersigned, unless the parties agree to a trial by a Magistrate Judge, pursuant to 28 USC 636(c). Signed by Judge William O. Bertelsman on 06/18/2010. (TJZ)cc: COR
|
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Your Choice Wholesale LLC; Summons issued and returned to counsel electronically (TJZ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT ( Filing fee $402; receipt number AKYEDC-5418635), filed by Fotohaus, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Ex 1-Copyright Certificate, #3 Ex 2-Screenshots, #4 Summons)(TJZ) |
| Conflict Check run. (TJZ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Fotohaus, LLC v. Your Choice Wholesale LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Fotohaus, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Craig A. Wirth |
| Represented By: | Joseph Allan Cobb |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Your Choice Wholesale LLC | |
| Represented By: | Mary P. Rafizadeh |
| Represented By: | John Anthony Fortner |
| Represented By: | Joseph W. Holbrook |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
