Maddox v. Pike Electric, LLC
| Eric D. Maddox |
| Pike Electric, LLC doing business as Floyd S. Pike Electrical Contractor, LLC |
| 2:2022cv00149 |
| December 7, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| Edward B Atkins |
| William O Bertelsman |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 30, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 NOTICE by Eric D. Maddox of Service of Plaintiff's Initial Disclosures (Rhoads, Christopher) |
| Filing 10 INITIAL DISCLOSURES by Pike Electric, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Insurance Declarations Page)(Dutton, Cyrus) |
Filing 9
SCHEDULING ORDER: 1. The parties shall exchange Rule 26(a)(1) disclosures by January 30, 2023. These disclosures need not be filed in the Court record. The parties shall timely exchange supplemental information as required by Rule 26(e). Supplementation is due within 30 days of discovery of new information or the need to supplement but shall occur no later than 30 days prior to the discovery deadline. 2. The parties shall file any motion to join parties or amend pleadings by August 30, 2023. 3. No later than January 30, 2024, counsel for the parties shall complete all pretrial fact discovery. All expert discovery shall be completed no later than May 30, 2024. This deadline means, as relevant, service of written discovery calculated to secure a response by and compliant with the deadline. 4. Per Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2), no later than February 28, 2024, the plaintiff shall disclose the identity of expert witnesses who may be used at trial, accompanied by written reports signed by the Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(B) expert witness and/or written summaries consistent with Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(C), as applicable, all in compliance with the rule. The same is required by the defendant no later than April 30, 2024. These disclosures need not be filed in the Court record. 5. Per Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(e)(2), no later than June 30, 2024, Plaintiffs and Defendants shall serve their supplemental expert reports. 6. A status report is due no later than May 30, 2024 (close of discovery). The report should indicate the progress of the case and the status of settlement negotiations, the likelihood of settlement, and the feasibility of alternative dispute resolution, including the parties views on the method of resolution (i.e., mediation, arbitration, settlement conference with the Court, summary jury trial, etc.) 7. The parties shall have to and including August 30, 2024, by which to file all dispositive motions and Daubert motions, with response and reply time as per Local Rule 7.1(c). Although documents must now be filed electronically with the Court clerk, a PAPER courtesy copy shall be provided to the Chambers of Judge William Bertelsman within 48 hours of the filing of the brief or memorandum in support of any motion, where such brief or memorandum (including any attached exhibits) exceed 10 pages. 8. Requests to modify any dates or deadlines established by this order shall be submitted upon motion filed prior to expiration of the deadline in question, and upon showing of good cause beyond the control of counsel in the exercise of due diligence. See L.R. 7.1(b). Signed by Magistrate Judge Edward B. Atkins on 1/9/2023.(ECO)cc: COR
|
| ***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Edward B. Atkins for review: #8 Report of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting re: #7 Order For Meeting and Report (ECO) |
| ***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Edward B. Atkins for review: #6 Notice to Attorney Nathan L. Bishop (ECO) |
| Filing 8 JOINT REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Dutton, Cyrus) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER FOR MEETING AND REPORT: that the parties shall confer no later thanDecember 30, 2022 to consider the nature and basis of their claims and defenses and the possibilities for a prompt settlement or resolution of the case, to make or arrange for the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1), and to develop a proposed discovery plan. Such proposed plan shall be filed no later than January 6, 2023. Signed by Judge William O. Bertelsman on 12/21/2022.(ECO)cc: COR
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO ATTORNEY Nathan L. Bishop by Clerk re: L.R. 83 - Attorney Admission procedures w/ a copy of L.R. 83.1 and 83.2 (ECO) |
|
Filing 5
STANDING REFERRAL ORDER:1) Case referred to presiding Magistrate Judge to supervise discovery and pretrial proceedings; 2) Magistrate Judge is authorized to conduct all pretrial and status conferences, hold hearings as required, and rule on nondispositive motions. Dispositive motions and motions in limine will be referred by the Clerk of court to the undersigned. Subject to other provisions of law, the final pretrial conference and trial will be before the undersigned, unless the parties agree to a trial by a Magistrate Judge, pursuant to 28 USC 636(c). Signed by Judge William O. Bertelsman on 6/18/2010.(ECO)cc: COR
|
| Conflict Check run. (ECO) |
| Filing 4 FRCP 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Pike Electric, LLC. (ECO) |
| Filing 3 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Pike Electric, LLC.(ECO) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Mason Circuit Court, case number 22-CI-00216. ( Filing fee $402; receipt number AKYEDC-5429039), filed by Pike Electric, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-Email dated 12/6/2022, #2 Exhibit 2-State Court Record, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(ECO) Modified to correct date on 12/8/2022 (ECO). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
