Ratliff et al v. Kentucky Justice and Public Safety Cabinet - Department of Juvenile Justice et al
| Michelle Ratliff and Betty Tucker |
| Kentucky Justice and Public Safety Cabinet - Department of Juvenile Justice, R. David Kazee and Tera Beth Sweetland |
| 2:2023cv00160 |
| November 20, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| David L Bunning |
| Candace J Smith |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 11, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| ***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of David L. Bunning for review: #6 Report of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting (TDB) |
| Filing 6 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Baylous, Edward) |
Filing 5
ORDER FOR MEETING AND REPORT: 1) Within 21 days parties shall meet to discuss nature of claims/defenses, possibilities for a prompt settlement and develop a proposed discovery plan. 2) Within 10 days after meeting, parties shall file a joint status report containing: a) discovery plan; b) time necessary to file pretrial motions; c) whether matter is suitable for ADR; d) estimate of length of trial; e) whether parties will consent to jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge for all further proceedings. Consent forms attached. 3) If joint report is not possible, parties shall file individual reports. Signed by Judge David L. Bunning on 1/2/2024. (Attachments: #1 MJ Consent Form)(TJG)cc: COR
|
| ***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of David L Bunning for review: #4 Answer to Complaint. (TJG) |
| Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint by R. David Kazee(individually), R. David Kazee(in his official capacity), Kentucky Justice and Public Safety Cabinet - Department of Juvenile Justice, Tera Beth Sweetland(in her official capacity), Tera Beth Sweetland(individually).(Baylous, Edward) |
| Conflict Check run. (TJG) |
|
Filing 3
STANDING REFERRAL ORDER: 1) Case referred to assigned U.S. Magistrate Judge to supervise discovery and pretrial proceedings; 2) Magistrate Judge is authorized to conduct all pretrial and status conferences, to hold such hearings as may be required, and to rule on nondispositive motions, except motions in limine. Dispositive motions and motions in limine will be referred by the Clerk of this court to the undersigned. The final pretrial conference and trial will also be before the undersigned, unless parties agree to a trial by a Magistrate Judge; 3) Discovery disputes shall be resolved in the following manner: (1) Parties to meet/confer in an attempt to resolve disputes; (2) If parties unable to resolve such disputes formally, they shall attempt to resolve their disagreements by telephone conference with the Magistrate Judge; (3) If parties unable to resolve their disputes after conference with the Magistrate Judge, they may file appropriate written motions with the Court, which shall include the certification required. Signed by Judge David L. Bunning on 1/13/2011.(TJG)cc: COR
|
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Campbell Circuit Court, case number 23-CI-00983. ( Filing fee $402; receipt number AKYEDC-5702065), filed by Tera Beth Sweetland, R. David Kazee, Kentucky Justice and Public Safety Cabinet - Department of Juvenile Justice. (Attachments: #1 State Court Complaint, #2 State Court Record, #3 Notice of Removal filed in State Court)(TJG) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
