Petrey v. Mazza, et al
Petitioner: William Royal Petrey
Respondent: Warden Kevin Mazza, Supreme Court of Kentucky, Kentucky Court of Appeals and Kenton Circuit Court
Case Number: 2:2023cv00169
Filed: December 8, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Presiding Judge: Claria Horn Boom
Referring Judge: Matthew A Stinnett
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 18, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 29, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER: that Petrey shall have until February 28, 2024, by which to pay the filing fee or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis in conformity with 28 U.S.C. 1915. Signed by Magistrate Judge Candace J. Smith on 1/29/2024.(TDB)cc: COR and William Royal Petrey by US Mail
January 5, 2024 Filing 4 MOTION for Additional Argument by William Royal Petrey, pro se. (Attachments: #1 envelope no pm)(TJG)
January 5, 2024 ***MOTION SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Matthew A. Stinnett for review: re #4 MOTION for Additional Argument by William Royal Petrey (TJG)
December 8, 2023 Filing 3 IMPORTANT NOTICE to Pro Se Filer: Information relating to pro se filings and F.R.Civ.P. 5.2 requiring personal identifiers be partially redacted from documents filed with the court. #Click here for more information on the rules. It is the sole responsibility of counsel and the parties to comply with the rules requiring redaction of personal data identifiers.cc: pro se filer via U.S. Mail (Attachments: #1 sample page)(TJG)
December 8, 2023 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by William Royal Petrey. (Attachments: #1 envelope)(TJG)
December 8, 2023 ***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Matthew A. Stinnett for review: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (TJG)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Petrey v. Mazza, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: William Royal Petrey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden Kevin Mazza
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Supreme Court of Kentucky
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Kentucky Court of Appeals
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Kenton Circuit Court
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?