Ismail et al v. Byers
Mohammad Ali Bin Ismail |
Shawn Byers and Jailer Jason Maydak |
2:2023cv00171 |
December 8, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
David L Bunning |
Candace J Smith |
Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 RESPONSE to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, by Jason Maydak. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-BCDC Detailed Release Report, #2 Exhibit 2-ICE Order of Release)(Mando, Jeffrey) Modified text on 12/21/2023 (SLG). |
***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of David L. Bunning for review: #8 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal. (SLG) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Mohammad Ali Bin Ismail (Johannsen, August) |
Filing 7 CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT re #5 Order as to Shawn Byers. (SLG) |
Filing 6 CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT re #5 to Jason Maydak. (SLG) |
Filing 5 ORDER: The Clerk of the Court SHALL send a copy of the Petition #1 , all exhibits attached thereto, and this Order by certified mail to: Jason Maydak Jailer and Shawn Byers. Respondents SHALL respond to the Petition #1 within ten (10) days from the entry of this Order. Ismail may file a reply brief in further support of his petition within five (5) days after Respondents file their response; and Ismail SHALL promptly notify the Court if his custodial status changes while his habeas petition is pending before the Court. Signed by Judge David L. Bunning on 12/11/2023.(SLG)cc: COR and certified mail to Jason Maydak and Shawn Byers. |
Filing 4 MOTION FOR EXPEDITED CONSIDERATION OF PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS by Mohammad Ali Bin Ismail. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(SLG) |
Filing 3 STANDING REFERRAL ORDER: 1) Case referred to assigned U.S. Magistrate Judge at Covington to supervise discovery and pretrial proceedings; 2) Magistrate Judge is authorized to conduct all pretrial and status conferences, to hold such hearings as may be required, and to rule on nondispositive motions, except motions in limine. Dispositive motions and motions in limine will be referred by the Clerk of this court to the undersigned. The final pretrial conference and trial will also be before the undersigned, unless parties agree to a trial by a Magistrate Judge; 3) Discovery disputes shall be resolved in the following manner: (1) Parties to meet/confer in an attempt to resolve disputes; (2) If parties unable to resolve such disputes formally, they shall attempt to resolve their disagreements by telephone conference with the Magistrate Judge; 3) If parties unable to resolve their disputes after conference with the Magistrate Judge, they may file appropriate written motions with the Court, which shall include the certification required. Signed by Judge David L. Bunning on 1/13/2011.(SLG)cc: COR |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number AKYEDC-5715247.), filed by Mohammad Ali Bin Ismail. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Declaration of Mohammad Ali Bin Ismail, #2 Exhibit B-Notice of Address, #3 Exhibit C-Order of Immigration Judge, #4 Exhibit D-DOJ Submission of Documents, #5 Exhibit E-Subpoena, #6 Exhibit F-Declaration of Daniel Bible, #7 Exhibit G-Email, #8 Index of Documents, #9 Civil Cover Sheet)(SLG) |
Conflict Check run. (SLG) |
***MOTION SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of David L. Bunning for review: re #4 MOTION FOR EXPEDITED CONSIDERATION OF PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS. (SLG) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.