Pierson v. Voelker et al
| Jacqueline Greer Pierson |
| Hon. Allison Jones, Charles Vaughn, Abigail Voelker, James Lambert, Kristin Turner, Larry Thompson and Bethany Knorr |
| 2:2024cv00166 |
| October 10, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| David L Bunning |
| P SO |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| Civil Miscellaneous Case |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 19, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 JUDGMENT: 1) Plaintiffs complaint #1 is DISMISSED without prejudice. 2) This action is STRICKEN from the Courts active docket. 3) This is a FINAL and APPEALABLE Judgment, and there is no just cause for delay. Signed by Judge David L. Bunning on 11/19/2024. (WHP) cc: COR and Jacqueline Greer Pierson by US Mail |
Filing 8
ORDER: 1) Plaintiffs complaint #1 is DISMISSED without prejudice. 2) This action is STRICKEN from the Courts active docket. 3) The Court will enter a corresponding Judgment. Signed by Judge David L. Bunning on 11/19/2024. (WHP) cc: COR and Jacqueline Greer Pierson by US Mail
|
| Filing 7 Partial Filing fee received - $ 3, receipt number 200001964 (WHP) |
| Filing 6 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Jacqueline Greer Pierson #5 filed by Jacqueline Greer Pierson. (WHP) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER: (1) Within thirty (30) days from the entry of this Order, Plaintiff must pay an additional $3.00 to the Clerk of this Court in order to fully satisfy her fee-related obligations in this case; (2) Within thirty (30) days from the entry of this Order, Plaintiff must also file a written submission with this Court explaining why this action should not be dismissed without prejudice for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. If Plaintiff fails to file such a written submission within the time allotted, the Court will dismiss this action without prejudice; and (3) Once Plaintiff files her written response to this Order or the foregoing time period has passed, the Court will issue a new Order in this case. Signed by Judge David L. Bunning on 10/16/2024. (TBB)cc: COR and Jacqueline Greer Pierson by US Mail
|
|
Filing 4
STANDING ORDER re: Disclosure of Contact Information: 1. pro se litigants must provide current telephone number, residential address, & if different, mailing address. 2. pro se litigants must provide written notice of change of residential address, & if different, mailing address. 3. Clerk file copy of Order in all non-prisoner pro se actions. Failure to provide required information or change of address may result in appropriate sanctions.. Signed by Judge Karen K. Caldwell on 5/6/2016.(WHP)cc: CORand Jacqueline Pierson by US Mail
|
| Filing 3 IMPORTANT NOTICE to Pro Se Filer: Information relating to pro se filings and F.R.Civ.P. 5.2 requiring personal identifiers be partially redacted from documents filed with the court. #Click here for more information on the rules. It is the sole responsibility of counsel and the parties to comply with the rules requiring redaction of personal data identifiers.cc: pro se filer via U.S. Mail (Attachments: #1 sample caption)(WHP) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT (NO PROCESS REQUESTED). ( Filing fee $402; receipt number 200001883), filed by Jacqueline Greer Pierson. (Attachments: #1 receipt)(WHP) |
| Conflict Check run. (WHP) |
| ***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of PSO for review: #1 Complaint (WHP) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
