Wilkerson v. City of Frankfort, Kentucky et al

Justia Dockets & Filings Sixth Circuit Kentucky Eastern District Wilkerson v. City of Frankfort, Kentucky et al

Wilkerson v. City of Frankfort, Kentucky et al

Plaintiff:	Natalie Wilkerson
Defendant:	City of Frankfort, Kentucky and Stephen Sutton
Case Number:	3:2008cv00012
Filed:	March 26, 2008
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Office:	Civil Rights: Other Office
County:	Franklin
Presiding Judge:	Pro Se
Presiding Judge:	Danny C. Reeves
Nature of Suit:	Defendant
Cause of Action:	Federal Question
Jury Demanded By:	28:1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
April 16, 2009	Filing 48 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: Defendants motion for summary judgment [Record No. 18] is DENIED regarding (a) the excessive force claim asserted against Stephen Sutton in his individual capacity pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983; (b) the state c laims for excessive force and assault asserted against all Defendants; and (c) the excessive force claim asserted against all Defendants pursuant to Section 10 of the Kentucky Constitution. The Defendants motion for summary judgment [Record No. 18] is GRANTED regarding all other federal and state claims asserted against all Defendants. (Motions terminated: 18 MOTION for Summary Judgment). Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 4/16/2009.(AKR)cc: COR
March 3, 2009	Filing 31 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: Defendants' Motion 19 Motion in Limine is GRANTED. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 3/3/2009. (CBD)cc: COR

Date Filed

Document Text

April 16, 2009

Filing 48 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: Defendants motion for summary judgment [Record No. 18] is DENIED regarding (a) the excessive force claim asserted against Stephen Sutton in his individual capacity pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983; (b) the state c laims for excessive force and assault asserted against all Defendants; and (c) the excessive force claim asserted against all Defendants pursuant to Section 10 of the Kentucky Constitution. The Defendants motion for summary judgment [Record No. 18] is GRANTED regarding all other federal and state claims asserted against all Defendants. (Motions terminated: 18 MOTION for Summary Judgment). Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 4/16/2009.(AKR)cc: COR

March 3, 2009

Filing 31 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: Defendants' Motion 19 Motion in Limine is GRANTED. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 3/3/2009. (CBD)cc: COR

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wilkerson v. City of Frankfort, Kentucky et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Natalie Wilkerson
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: City of Frankfort, Kentucky
Represented By:	Robert C. Moore
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Stephen Sutton
Represented By:	Stephen D. Wolnitzek
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?