Beverly v. MEVA Formwork Systems, Inc
Robert Beverly |
MEVA Formwork Systems, Inc |
3:2008cv00029 |
June 16, 2008 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
P.I.: Other Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Danny C. Reeves |
James B Todd |
Plaintiff |
Diversity |
28:1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 150 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: that MEVA Formwork's Mtn in Limine to Exclude Testimony of Michael C. Wright & Certain Exhibits Regarding the MEVA Technical Instruction Manual [Record No. 139] is DENIED filed by MEVA Formwork Systems, Inc. S igned by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 06/07/2010. (Motions terminated: 139 MOTION in Limine by MEVA Formwork Systems, Inc to Exclude Testimony of Michael C. Wright and Certain Exhibits Regarding the MEVA Technical Instruction Manual).(AKR)cc: COR |
Filing 138 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: that Meva Formwork Systems, Inc.'s motion to exclude the legal conclusions contained in the CSHO/Optional Report #:S0124-031-07 [Record No. 93] is GRANTED. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 05/11/2010. (Motions terminated: 93 MOTION in Limine). (AKR)cc: COR |
Filing 136 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: (1) Defendant Meva Formwork Systems, Inc.s motion strike Dr. Warren Bilkey as an expert witness during the upcoming trial of this action [Record No. 120] is GRANTED. (2) Defendant Meva Formwork Systems, Inc.s motio n strike Dr. Veronica Kavorkian as an expert witness during the upcoming trial of this action [Record No. 120] is DENIED. (2) The discovery deadline shall be extended to June 7, 2010, to allow for additionaldiscovery, including a deposition, with respect to Dr. McKiernan. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 05/04/2010. (Motions terminated: 120 MOTION to Strike), ( Discovery due by 6/7/2010.)(AKR)cc: COR |
Filing 135 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: that Plaintiff Robert Beverly's motion to reconsider [Record No. 132] is DENIED. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 05/03/2010. (Motions terminated: 132 MOTION for Reconsideration re 126 Order on Motion for Summary Judgment) (AKR)cc: COR |
Filing 129 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: 1. Defendant MEVA Formwork Systems, Inc.s motion for an apportionment jury instruction 77 is GRANTED. 2. Defendant MEVA Formwork Systems, Inc.s motion for leave to file a third party complaint 78 is DENIED as moot. 3. Defendant MEVA Formwork Systems, Inc.s motion for this Court to hold a ruling on its motion to file a third party complaint in abeyance 81 is DENIED as moot. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 3/24/2010.(CBD)cc: COR |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Beverly v. MEVA Formwork Systems, Inc | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Robert Beverly | |
Represented By: | Richard M. Sullivan |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: MEVA Formwork Systems, Inc | |
Represented By: | David Domene |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.