USA v. Two Parcels of Real Property in Shelby County, Kentucky, owned by Sigifredo Gutierrez
| USA |
| Two Parcels of Real Property in Shelby County, Kentucky, owned by Sigifredo Gutierrez |
| 3:2008cv00067 |
| September 30, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| Drug Related Seizure of Property Office |
| Shelby |
| Danny C. Reeves |
| None |
| U.S. Government Plaintiff |
| 21:881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: USA v. Two Parcels of Real Property in Shelby County, Kentucky, owned by Sigifredo Gutierrez | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: USA | |
| Represented By: | David Y. Olinger, Jr. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Two Parcels of Real Property in Shelby County, Kentucky, owned by Sigifredo Gutierrez | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
