Jones v. Chanlar et al
Allen Jones |
Larry D. Chandler, Air Mark, Page Magire, File Parker and Nincy Doom Warden |
3:2011cv00055 |
August 29, 2011 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
Frankfort Office |
Franklin |
PSO |
Danny C. Reeves |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: (1) The Clerk of the Court shall list Al Parks and Ernie Fletcher as additional defendants to this proceeding. (2) This action is DISMISSED and STRICKEN from the Court's docket. The claims asserted in t his action by Plaintiff Allen Jones based upon allegations that: (1) he was paid less than the minimum wage ; (2) he was exposed to toxic paint odors and suffered medical complications as a result of this alleged exposure; (3) he was retaliated again st in response to the exercise of First Amendment rights, and (4) the Internal Revenue Service or any other entity should be compelled to investigate or take criminal action against any defendant to thisproceeding, are DISMISSED, with prejudice. Addi tionally, Jones's claims for punitive damages as well as his claims for monetary damages and/or injunctive relief against the defendants in their official and individual capacities are DISMISSED, with prejudice. Jones's claim that food served to inmates lacks sufficient caloric content is DISMISSED, without prejudice. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 6/6/2012.(AKR)cc: COR |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.