Vaughan v. Ky Army National Guard et al
| Michael Dean Vaughan |
| United States Department of the Army and Ky Army National Guard |
| 3:2012cv00035 |
| May 29, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| Frankfort Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Danny C. Reeves |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
38
JUDGMENT: (1) All claims asserted by Plaintiff Michael Dean Vaughan regarding the AR 15-6 Report, the letter of reprimand, and the Officer Evaluation Report are DISMISSED, with prejudice. Judgment is entered in favor of the Defendants Kentucky Arm y National Guard and United States Department of the Army with respect to these claims. (2) All remaining claims asserted in this action by Plaintiff Michael Dean Vaughan are DISMISSED, without prejudice. (3) This action is DISMISSED and STRICKEN from the Courts docket. (4) This is a FINAL and APPEALABLE Judgment and there is no just cause for delay. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 1/18/2013.(CBD)cc: COR, Michael D. Vaughan via US Mail
|
|
Filing
24
MEMORANDUM ORDER: that Plaintiff Michael Dean Vaughan's Request for Judicial Notice (Record No. 23 ) is DENIED. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 8/15/2012.(AKR)cc: COR, Plaintiff via US Mail
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
