Conway v. Glaxosmithkline, LLC

Plaintiff: Jack Conway
Defendant: Glaxosmithkline, LLC
Case Number: 3:2013cv00015
Filed: March 25, 2013
Court: Kentucky Eastern District Court
Office: Frankfort Office
County: Franklin
Presiding Judge: Gregory F. VanTatenhove
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal
Jury Demanded By: None

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Conway v. Glaxosmithkline, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jack Conway
Represented By: A. Layne Stackhouse
Represented By: S. Ann Saucer
Represented By: Bill Robins, III
Represented By: Elizabeth Ungar Natter
Represented By: Dinah L. Koehler
Represented By: Justin R. Kaufman
Represented By: Lawrence L. Jones, II
Represented By: Robyn R. Bender
Represented By: Tyler S. Stewart
Represented By: Jasper D. Ward, IV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Glaxosmithkline, LLC
Represented By: Carol Dan Browning
Represented By: Nina M. Gussack
Represented By: Kenneth J. King
Represented By: Hyung P. Steele
Represented By: Kristina M. Wetterer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.