Taylor v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association et al
Antoinette C. Taylor |
Jamie L. James, JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association and Julie M. Fry |
3:2013cv00024 |
May 3, 2013 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
Frankfort Office |
Shelby |
PSO |
Gregory F. VanTatenhove |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 40 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: (1) The Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (R. 6 ) is GRANTED; (2) The Defendants' Second Motion to Dismiss (R. 16 ) is GRANTED; (3) The Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File a Second Amended Complaint (R. [1 1]) is DENIED; (4) The Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Remand and a Stay (R. 19 ) is DENIED; (5) The Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Additional Evidence (R. 28 ) is DENIED; (6) The Bank Defendants' Motion for Leave to File a Sur -Reply (R. 32 ) and the Plaintiff's Motion to Strike that Sur-Reply (R. 34 ) are DENIED, as moot; (7) The Bank Defendants' Motion for Expedited Status Conference (R. 37 ) is DENIED, as moot; (8) The Plaintiff's claims against the Ba nk Defendants are DISMISSED; (9) All claims being resolved, the Court will enter an appropriate JUDGMENT; and (10) This case is STRICKEN from the active docket of this Court. Signed by Judge Gregory F. Van Tatenhove on 1/8/2014.(AKR)cc: COR, Plaintiff via US Mail |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.