Harris v. Jiangsu ASG Earth Environmental Protection Science and Technology Co., Ltd. et al
Plaintiff: Kenneth Matthew Harris
Defendant: Jiangsu ASG Earth Environmental Protection Science and Technology Co., Ltd., JAS Forwarding (USA), Inc. and China Container Line Ltd.
Intervenor_plaintiff: Liberty Mutual Group
Case Number: 3:2013cv00044
Filed: July 23, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Office: Frankfort Office
County: Franklin
Presiding Judge: Gregory F. Van Tatenhove
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 13, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 81 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: that Plaintiff Harris's motion for default judgment [R. 75] is GRANTED. Harris shall be awarded $127,066.57 in past medical expenses; $250,000.00 in future medical expenses; $513,000.00 for loss of future wages; and $2,000,000.00 for pain and suffering. Judgment against Jiangsu ASG in the amount of $2,890,066.57 shall be entered contemporaneously herewith. Signed by Judge Gregory F. VanTatenhove on 7/13/2017.(AKR)cc: COR
September 18, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 28 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: 1. China Container's Motion for Summary Judgment [R. 14] is DENIED without PREJUDICE with leave to refile; 2. China Containers' Motion to Strike Docket Entry 21 [R. 22] is GRANTED; and, 3. The Plaintiff SHALL, within seven (7) days of the filing of this Order, provide the Court with an updated status report as to the service of Jiangsu. Signed by Judge Gregory F. VanTatenhove on 9/18/2014.(AKR)cc: COR
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Harris v. Jiangsu ASG Earth Environmental Protection Science and Technology Co., Ltd. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kenneth Matthew Harris
Represented By: David J. Guarnieri
Represented By: Brittany B. Koch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jiangsu ASG Earth Environmental Protection Science and Technology Co., Ltd.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JAS Forwarding (USA), Inc.
Represented By: Barry F. Fagel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: China Container Line Ltd.
Represented By: George B. Hocker
Represented By: William H. Partin, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Intervenor_plaintiff: Liberty Mutual Group
Represented By: Tighe Alexander Estes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?