Thurman et al v. Hawkins et al
Plaintiff: Lori Osborne and Rosemary Thurman
Defendant: John Hawkins, William Lindon and Derran Broyles
Case Number: 3:2013cv00050
Filed: August 16, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Office: Frankfort Office
County: Franklin
Presiding Judge: Gregory F. Van Tatenhove
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 7, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 41 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: (1) The summary judgment motions of Troopers William Lindon and John Hawkins [R. 29, 31] are GRANTED; (2) Plaintiffs' federal claims are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; (3) The Court declines to exercise supplemen tal jurisdiction; therefore, the state law claims against Troopers Lindon and Hawkins are hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; (4) This case is hereby STRICKEN from the active docket of this Court; and (5) This is a FINAL and APPEALABLE order. Signed by Judge Gregory F. VanTatenhove on 1/7/2015.(AKR)cc: COR
September 3, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 27 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER:(1) Sergeant Broyless Motion to Dismiss [R. 9] is GRANTED; (2) All claims against Sergeant Broyles in this action are DISMISSED; (3) The Plaintiffs shall have fourteen (14) days from the entry of this Order to file a mot ion for leave to amend the complaint, or the Court shall enter a final judgment in favor of Sergeant Broyles in this matter; and (4) A separate Order shall enter directing the remaining parties to meet for the conference required by Rule 26(f). Signed by Judge Gregory F. VanTatenhove on 9/3/2014.(AKR)cc: COR
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Thurman et al v. Hawkins et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Hawkins
Represented By: Christian Matthew Feltner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: William Lindon
Represented By: Christian Matthew Feltner
Represented By: William E. Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Derran Broyles
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lori Osborne
Represented By: J. Richard Clay
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rosemary Thurman
Represented By: J. Richard Clay
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?