Thurman et al v. Hawkins et al
Lori Osborne and Rosemary Thurman |
John Hawkins, William Lindon and Derran Broyles |
3:2013cv00050 |
August 16, 2013 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
Frankfort Office |
Franklin |
Gregory F. Van Tatenhove |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 41 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: (1) The summary judgment motions of Troopers William Lindon and John Hawkins [R. 29, 31] are GRANTED; (2) Plaintiffs' federal claims are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; (3) The Court declines to exercise supplemen tal jurisdiction; therefore, the state law claims against Troopers Lindon and Hawkins are hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; (4) This case is hereby STRICKEN from the active docket of this Court; and (5) This is a FINAL and APPEALABLE order. Signed by Judge Gregory F. VanTatenhove on 1/7/2015.(AKR)cc: COR |
Filing 27 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER:(1) Sergeant Broyless Motion to Dismiss [R. 9] is GRANTED; (2) All claims against Sergeant Broyles in this action are DISMISSED; (3) The Plaintiffs shall have fourteen (14) days from the entry of this Order to file a mot ion for leave to amend the complaint, or the Court shall enter a final judgment in favor of Sergeant Broyles in this matter; and (4) A separate Order shall enter directing the remaining parties to meet for the conference required by Rule 26(f). Signed by Judge Gregory F. VanTatenhove on 9/3/2014.(AKR)cc: COR |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.