Driend v. Itron, Inc.
Plaintiff: Nancy J. Driend
Defendant: Itron, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2015cv00081
Filed: November 21, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Office: Frankfort Office
County: Owen
Presiding Judge: Edward B. Atkins
Presiding Judge: Gregory F. VanTatenhove
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 621
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 1, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 33 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: that the Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [R. 12] is GRANTED, the case will be STRICKEN from the record, and an appropriate judgment will be entered contemporaneously herewith. Signed by Judge Gregory F. VanTatenhove on 9/1/2017.(AKR)cc: COR
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Driend v. Itron, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nancy J. Driend
Represented By: F. Bruce Abel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Itron, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?