The Libertarian Party of Kentucky et al v. Grimes et al
Plaintiff: The Libertarian Party of Kentucky, Libertarian National Committee, Inc., Ken Moellman, Jr. and Constitution Party of Kentucky
Case Number: 3:2015cv00086
Filed: December 4, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Office: Frankfort Office
County: Franklin
Presiding Judge: Gregory F. VanTatenhove
Nature of Suit: Voting
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 8, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 46 JUDGMENT: 1. Judgment is entered in favor of the Defendants with respect to all issues raised in this proceeding; 2. Any pending motions 43 are DENIED; as MOOT; 3. This action is DISMISSED and STRICKEN from the Court's active docket; and 4. This is a FINAL and APPEALABLE Judgment and there is no just cause for delay. Signed by Judge Gregory F. VanTatenhove on 7/8/2016.(CBD)cc: COR
February 22, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 26 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: 1. The Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendants Alison Lundergan Grimes and the Kentucky State Board of Elections [R. 7] is DENIED; 2. The Motion to Dismiss filed by Attorney General Beshear [R. 6] is GRANTED; and 3. The Plaintiffs' claims against Attorney General Beshear in his official capacity are hereby terminated from the case. Signed by Judge Gregory F. VanTatenhove on 2/22/2016.(AKR)cc: COR
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: The Libertarian Party of Kentucky et al v. Grimes et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: The Libertarian Party of Kentucky
Represented By: Thomas B. Bruns
Represented By: Paul J. Darpel
Represented By: Jack S. Gatlin
Represented By: Brandon N. Voelker
Represented By: Christopher David Wiest
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Libertarian National Committee, Inc.
Represented By: Thomas B. Bruns
Represented By: Paul J. Darpel
Represented By: Jack S. Gatlin
Represented By: Brandon N. Voelker
Represented By: Christopher David Wiest
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ken Moellman, Jr.
Represented By: Thomas B. Bruns
Represented By: Paul J. Darpel
Represented By: Jack S. Gatlin
Represented By: Brandon N. Voelker
Represented By: Christopher David Wiest
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Constitution Party of Kentucky
Represented By: Thomas B. Bruns
Represented By: Paul J. Darpel
Represented By: Jack S. Gatlin
Represented By: Brandon N. Voelker
Represented By: Christopher David Wiest
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?