Rowland v. Franklin County, Kentucky et al
| Kimissa Rowland |
| Franklin County, Kentucky, Rick Rogers, Southern Health Partners, Inc., Jane Bartram, Stacy Jensen and Sabina Trivette |
| 3:2018cv00033 |
| June 21, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| Frankfort Office |
| Franklin |
| Gregory F. VanTatenhove |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
117
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: 1. Defendants' Motion to Exclude [R. 102 ] is GRANTED IN PART, DENIED IN PART, and DENIED AS MOOT IN PART; 2. Defendants' Motion for Leave to File [R. 103 ] is DENIED; 3. Defendants' Tendered Second Motion for Summary Judgment [R. 104 ] is STRICKEN from the Record; 4. Defendants' Motion to Exclude [R. 52 ] is DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by Judge Gregory F. Van Tatenhove on 2/23/2022.(JJ)cc: COR
|
|
Filing
75
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: 53 MOTION for Summary Judgment is GRNATED IN PART. Ms. Rowland's § 1983 claims of deliberate indifference against Nurse Bartram, Nurse Jensen, and Nurse Trivette, set out in Count 1 of the Complaint [R. 1] are DISMISSED. Likewise, Ms. Rowland's claim against § 1983 predicated upon a theory of Monell liability is DISMISSED. Finally, Ms. Rowland's request for punitive damages is DENIED. Signed by Judge Gregory F. Van Tatenhove on 7/27/2020.(SCD)cc: COR
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
