Almon et al v. Kilgore et al
Sarah J. Almon |
Jared F. Newberry, Jermaine Kilgore and Kentucky State Police |
3:2019cv00004 |
January 14, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
Gregory F VanTatenhove |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 13, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: 1) #4 MOTION to Dismiss is GRANTED. 2) All claims filed by Pla against Dfts Kentucky State Police, Jermaine Kilgore in his official capacity, and Jared F. Newberry in his official capacity are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 3) #5 MOTION to Dismiss is GRANTED. 4) All claims filed by Pla against Jermaine Kilgore in his individual capacity and Jared F. Newberry in his individual capacity are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Gregory F. VanTatenhove on 3/13/2019.(SCD)cc: COR |
***MOTION SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Judge Van Tatenhove for review: re #5 MOTION to Dismiss by Jermaine Kilgore, Jared F. Newberry in Their Individual Capacity (CBD) |
Filing 9 REPLY to Response to Motion re #5 MOTION to Dismiss by Jermaine Kilgore, Jared F. Newberry in Their Individual Capacity filed by Jermaine Kilgore, Jared F. Newberry. (Miller, Lyndol) |
Filing 8 RESPONSE to Motion re #5 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Sarah J. Almon. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Pohl, Martin) Modified on 2/25/2019 (SCD). |
Filing 7 ORDER: It is ordered that the #6 Proposed Agreed Order is GRANTED and Pla shall have up to and including 2/25/2019 by which to file a response to Dfts' #5 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Gregory F. VanTatenhove on 2/13/2019.(SCD)cc: COR |
***MOTION SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Judge Van Tatenhove for review: re #6 Proposed Agreed Order/Stipulation to file a Response to motion to dismiss (DN 5) (CBD) |
Filing 6 Proposed Agreed Order/Stipulation to file a Response to the pending motion to dismiss (DN 5) by Jermaine Kilgore, Jared F. Newberry. (Miller, Lyndol) Modified text on 2/13/2019 (CBD). |
Filing 5 MOTION to Dismiss by Jermaine Kilgore, Jared F. Newberry in Their Individual Capacity (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support of Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss by Defendants Jermaine Kilgore and Jared Newberry in Their Individual Capacity, #2 Exhibit 1 - Pugh v. Meinhart, 2018 WL 6721298, 3 (Ky. Ct. App. Dec. 21, 2018), #3 Exhibit 2 - Courtnet Docket report for Shelby Circuit Court 17-CR-00322, #4 Exhibit 3 - Pursifull v. Abner, 2016 WL 5335515, 4 (Ky. Ct. App. September 23, 2016), #5 Proposed Order)(Miller, Lyndol) |
Filing 4 MOTION to Dismiss for failure to state a claim by Kentucky State Police, Jermaine Kilgore, Jared F. Newberry , MOTION to Dismiss by Kentucky State Police, Jermaine Kilgore, Jared F. Newberry , MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by Kentucky State Police, Jermaine Kilgore, Jared F. Newberry (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Granting Motion to Dismiss Official Capacity Claims)(Arnett, Alea) |
Conflict Check run. (CBD) |
Filing 2 FRCP 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Kentucky State Police identifying Other Affiliate Commonwealth of Kentucky, Other Affiliate Kentucky Justice and Public Safety Cabinet for Kentucky State Police.. (CBD) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Shelby Circuit Court, case number 18-CI-00655 ( Filing fee $400; receipt number 0643-4260188), filed by Jared F. Newberry, Jermaine Kilgore, Jermaine Kilgore, Kentucky State Police, Jared F. Newberry. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 State Court Record - Complaint)(CBD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.