Williams v. Radius Health, Inc.
Keith Williams |
Radius Health, Inc. |
3:2019cv00009 |
February 7, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
Gregory F VanTatenhove |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 5, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Judge Van Tatenhove for review: re #9 Proposed Agreed Order/Stipulation (CBD) |
Filing 9 STIPULATION of Dismissal of Count II of Plaintiff's Complaint by Radius Health, Inc.. (Nahavandi, Amir) Modified on 4/5/2019 (CBD). |
***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Judge Van Tatenhove for review: #8 Report of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting (CBD) |
Filing 8 JOINT REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Nahavandi, Amir) |
Filing 7 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment by Radius Health, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support of Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, #2 Exhibit A - Louise Lyons Affidavit, #3 Exhibit B - KRS 344.030, #4 Exhibit C - 2017 and 2018 tax records, #5 Proposed Order to Motion for Partial Summary Judgment)(Nahavandi, Amir) |
Filing 6 ORDER FOR MEETING AND REPORT: 1. No later than thirty (30) days from the date of entry and service of this order, counsel for the parties shall conduct the meeting of parties required by Rule 26(f). 2. At the time of the meeting, counsel for the parties shall exchange the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1) and, in the future, shall make supplemental disclosures when required by Rule 26(e). 3. No later than ten (10) days after the meeting, counsel for the parties shall file a written joint report outlining the proposed discovery plan. Signed by Judge Gregory F. VanTatenhove on 2/22/2019. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(CBD)cc: COR |
***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Judge Van Tatenhove for review: #1 Notice of Removal, #5 Answer to Complaint (SCD) |
Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint by Radius Health, Inc..(Nahavandi, Amir) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Donna King Perry, Amir J. Nahavandi on behalf of Radius Health, Inc. (CBD) |
Filing 2 FRCP 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Radius Health, Inc. identifying Other Affiliate BB Biotech AG for Radius Health, Inc. (CBD) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Franklin Circuit Court, case number 19-CI-49 ( Filing fee $400; receipt number 0643-4279851), filed by Radius Health, Inc. (Attachments: #1 State Court Record - Complaint, #2 Notice of Filing NOR, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(CBD) |
Conflict Check run. (CBD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Williams v. Radius Health, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Radius Health, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Amir J. Nahavandi |
Represented By: | Donna King Perry |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Keith Williams | |
Represented By: | Christina Thomas Mazaheri |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.