Williams v. Radius Health, Inc.
Plaintiff: Keith Williams
Defendant: Radius Health, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2019cv00009
Filed: February 7, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Presiding Judge: Gregory F VanTatenhove
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 5, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 5, 2019 ***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Judge Van Tatenhove for review: re #9 Proposed Agreed Order/Stipulation (CBD)
April 4, 2019 Filing 9 STIPULATION of Dismissal of Count II of Plaintiff's Complaint by Radius Health, Inc.. (Nahavandi, Amir) Modified on 4/5/2019 (CBD).
April 4, 2019 ***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Judge Van Tatenhove for review: #8 Report of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting (CBD)
April 3, 2019 Filing 8 JOINT REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Nahavandi, Amir)
March 14, 2019 Filing 7 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment by Radius Health, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support of Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, #2 Exhibit A - Louise Lyons Affidavit, #3 Exhibit B - KRS 344.030, #4 Exhibit C - 2017 and 2018 tax records, #5 Proposed Order to Motion for Partial Summary Judgment)(Nahavandi, Amir)
February 22, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER FOR MEETING AND REPORT: 1. No later than thirty (30) days from the date of entry and service of this order, counsel for the parties shall conduct the meeting of parties required by Rule 26(f). 2. At the time of the meeting, counsel for the parties shall exchange the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1) and, in the future, shall make supplemental disclosures when required by Rule 26(e). 3. No later than ten (10) days after the meeting, counsel for the parties shall file a written joint report outlining the proposed discovery plan. Signed by Judge Gregory F. VanTatenhove on 2/22/2019. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(CBD)cc: COR
February 15, 2019 ***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Judge Van Tatenhove for review: #1 Notice of Removal, #5 Answer to Complaint (SCD)
February 14, 2019 Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint by Radius Health, Inc..(Nahavandi, Amir)
February 7, 2019 Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Donna King Perry, Amir J. Nahavandi on behalf of Radius Health, Inc. (CBD)
February 7, 2019 Filing 2 FRCP 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Radius Health, Inc. identifying Other Affiliate BB Biotech AG for Radius Health, Inc. (CBD)
February 7, 2019 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Franklin Circuit Court, case number 19-CI-49 ( Filing fee $400; receipt number 0643-4279851), filed by Radius Health, Inc. (Attachments: #1 State Court Record - Complaint, #2 Notice of Filing NOR, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(CBD)
February 7, 2019 Conflict Check run. (CBD)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Williams v. Radius Health, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Radius Health, Inc.
Represented By: Amir J. Nahavandi
Represented By: Donna King Perry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Keith Williams
Represented By: Christina Thomas Mazaheri
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?