Cochran v. SSA
| Sarah Ann Cochran |
| Commissioner of SSA |
| 3:2019cv00039 |
| May 30, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| Danny C Reeves |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Commissioner of SSA. (Morgan, Cheryl) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Sarah Ann Cochran via USMS to Commissioner of SSA served on 6/10/2019. Service to U.S. Attorney executed via USMS on 6/10/2019; Service to U.S. Attorney General executed via USMS on 6/12/2019. (SCD) |
Filing 8
ORDER: It is ordered that #3 Motion for Melissa A. Palmer to Appear Pro Hac Vice is GRANTED. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 6/3/2019. (SCD)cc: COR
|
| BAR STATUS Check completed as to Melissa Palmer re #3 MOTION for Melissa A. Palmer to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Sarah Ann Cochran. (SCD) |
| ***MOTION SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Judge Reeves for review: re #3 MOTION for Melissa A. Palmer to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Sarah Ann Cochran. (SCD) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of SSA. Summons issued and delivered to U.S. Marshal with a completed USM-285 form and service packet for each defendant to be served. (Attachments: #1 Summons - US Attorney EDKY, #2 Summons - US Attorney General)(CBD) (Additional attachment(s) added on 5/31/2019: #3 USM receipt) (SCD). |
|
Filing 5
ORDER: 1. motion #2 for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. 2. The plaintiff may proceed herein without the payment of costs or fees. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 5/30/2019. (CBD)cc: COR, USM
|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Melissa A. Palmer to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Sarah Ann Cochran ( Filing fee $125; receipt number 0643-4372867) (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Certificate of Good Standing)(Palmer, Melissa) |
| Filing 2 MOTION (AO 240) for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Sarah Ann Cochran. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(CBD) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT, filed by Sarah Ann Cochran. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Letter to Clerk, #3 Summons - US Attorney EDKY, #4 Summons - Commissioner SSA, #5 Summons - US Attorney General, #6 USM 285 - US Atorney EDKY, #7 USM 285 - Commissioner SSA, #8 USM 285 - US Attorney General)(CBD) |
| Conflict Check run. (CBD) |
| ***MOTION SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Judge Reeves for review: re #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Sarah Ann Cochran (CBD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Cochran v. SSA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of SSA | |
| Represented By: | Cheryl D. Morgan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Sarah Ann Cochran | |
| Represented By: | Melissa Palmer |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
