Lee v. United of Omaha Life Insurance Company et al
Rachel Lee |
Topy America, Inc. and United of Omaha Life Insurance Company |
3:2020cv00026 |
April 22, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
Gregory F VanTatenhove |
Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 ORDER: Defendant Topy America's Motion to Dismiss #9 is DENIED as moot. Signed by Judge Gregory F. VanTatenhove on 6/9/2020. (CBD)cc: COR |
***MOTION SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Judge Van Tatenhove for review: #15 Notice of Withdrawal of Motion as Moot re #9 MOTION to Dismiss for failure to state a claim by Topy America, Inc. (CBD) Modified text on 6/5/2020 (CBD). |
Filing 15 NOTICE by Topy America, Inc. re #9 MOTION to Dismiss for failure to state a claim by Topy America, Inc. Withdrawal of Motion as Moot (Parsons, Matthew) |
***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Judge Van Tatenhove for review: #15 Notice of Withdrawal of #9 MOTION to Dismiss as Moot (CBD) |
Filing 14 ANSWER to #11 Amended Complaint by Topy America, Inc..(Parsons, Matthew) |
Filing 13 RESPONSE in Opposition re #9 MOTION to Dismiss for failure to state a claim by Topy America, Inc. filed by Rachel Lee. (Hagerman, Bartley) |
Filing 12 ANSWER to #11 Amended Complaint by United of Omaha Life Insurance Company.(Earl, Trevor) |
Filing 11 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Topy America, Inc., United of Omaha Life Insurance Company, filed by Rachel Lee. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex. 1 - Aff. Rachel Lee)(Hagerman, Bartley) Modified on 5/6/2020 (SCD). |
Filing 10 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Topy America, Inc.. (Miles, Amy) |
Filing 9 MOTION to Dismiss for failure to state a claim by Topy America, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex. A - Group Term Life Certificate, #2 Exhibit Ex. B - Group Term Life Certificate Summary, #3 Exhibit Ex. C - Voluntary Life Certificate, #4 Exhibit Ex. D - Voluntary Life Certificate Summary, #5 Exhibit Ex. E - J. Lee Daniel Letter, #6 Proposed Order)(Parsons, Matthew) |
Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint by United of Omaha Life Insurance Company.(Earl, Trevor) |
Filing 7 NOTICE by Topy America, Inc. re #1 Notice of Removal, Notice of Defendant Topy America, Inc. of Consent to Removal (Parsons, Matthew) |
Filing 6 FRCP 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Topy America, Inc.. (Parsons, Matthew) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Matthew R. Parsons on behalf of Topy America, Inc. (Parsons, Matthew) |
Filing 4 FRCP 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by United of Omaha Life Insurance Company identifying Corporate Parent Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company for United of Omaha Life Insurance Company.. (Earl, Trevor) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY RE: FAILURE TO FILE FRCP 7.1 DISCLOSURES to counsel of record, Trevor Earl. #1 Notice of Removal has been filed by United of Omaha Life Insurance Company without the required Rule 7.1 Disclosure statement. Rule 7.1 Disclosures must be filed within fourteen (14) calendar days. Failure to file the Disclosure Statement will cause the case to be submitted to the presiding judge for further action. cc: COR (CBD) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Franklin Circuit Court, case number 20-CI-308 ( Filing fee $400; receipt number 0643-4652738), filed by United of Omaha Life Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Record Complaint and Process, #2 Exhibit B - Notice of Filing NOR, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(CBD) |
Conflict Check run. (CBD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.