Clark et al v. Franklin County, Kentucky et al
Plaintiff: Maysia Harris and Hannah Clark
Defendant: Deputy Phillip Ray, Sgt. Nathan Doty, Franklin County, Kentucky and Sheriff Chris Quire
Case Number: 3:2021cv00026
Filed: June 21, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Presiding Judge: Gregory F VanTatenhove
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 18, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 CONVENTIONAL FILING received on behalf of Plaintiffs Hannah Clark & Maysia Harris. Exhibit 1 (1 CD) is filed per re #8 Notice of Filing re #7 Response in Opposition to Motion. (MAINTAINED ON THE SHELF IN THE CLERK'S OFFICE) (JJ)
August 18, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 NOTICE OF FILING by Hannah Clark, Maysia Harris re #7 Response in Opposition to Motion, Conventional Filing of Exhibit 1 to response (DVD of incident) (Belzley, Gregory)
August 18, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 RESPONSE in Opposition re #6 MOTION to Dismiss for failure to state a claim by Nathan Doty, Franklin County, Kentucky, Chris Quire, Phillip Ray filed by Hannah Clark, Maysia Harris. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Filler page for conventional filing of DVD of incident, #2 Proposed Order)(Belzley, Gregory)
July 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss for failure to state a claim by Nathan Doty, Franklin County, Kentucky, Chris Quire, Phillip Ray (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support of Motion to Dismiss, #2 Exhibit 1: Unpublished Cases, #3 Proposed Order Granting Motion to Dismiss)(Hagerman, Andrew)
July 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER: 1. Defendants' Motion for Extension of Time [R. #4 ] is GRANTED; and 2. Defendants shall have up to and including 8/2/21, to file a responsive pleading or pleadings to Plaintiffs' Complaint [R. #1 . Signed by Judge Gregory F. Van Tatenhove on 7/15/2021.(JJ)cc: COR
July 15, 2021 Opinion or Order ***MOTION SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Judge Gregory F. Van Tatenhove for review: re #4 Proposed Agreed Order for Enlargement of Time to File Responsive Pleading(s) to Complaint by Nathan Doty, Franklin County, Kentucky, Chris Quire, Phillip Ray (JJ)
July 14, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Proposed Agreed Order for Enlargement of Time to File Responsive Pleading(s) to Complaint by Nathan Doty, Franklin County, Kentucky, Chris Quire, Phillip Ray. (Hagerman, Andrew)
June 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Nathan Doty, Franklin County, Kentucky, Chris Quire, Phillip Ray; Summons issued and returned to counsel electronically. (MJY)
June 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $402; receipt number 0643-5000199), filed by Maysia Harris, Hannah Clark. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons for Franklin County Ky, #3 Summons for Sheriff Chris Quire, #4 Summons for Sgt. Nathan Doty, #5 Summons for Deputy Phillip Ray)(MJY)
June 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Conflict Check run. (MJY)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Clark et al v. Franklin County, Kentucky et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Deputy Phillip Ray
Represented By: Andrew Thomas Hagerman
Represented By: Paul Christopher Harnice
Represented By: Sarah Jackson Bishop
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sgt. Nathan Doty
Represented By: Andrew Thomas Hagerman
Represented By: Paul Christopher Harnice
Represented By: Sarah Jackson Bishop
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Franklin County, Kentucky
Represented By: Andrew Thomas Hagerman
Represented By: Paul Christopher Harnice
Represented By: Sarah Jackson Bishop
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sheriff Chris Quire
Represented By: Andrew Thomas Hagerman
Represented By: Paul Christopher Harnice
Represented By: Sarah Jackson Bishop
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Maysia Harris
Represented By: Michael L. Hawkins
Represented By: Gregory Allen Belzley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Hannah Clark
Represented By: Michael L. Hawkins
Represented By: Gregory Allen Belzley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?