Davis v. Sig Sauer, Inc.
| Timothy Davis |
| Sig Sauer, Inc. |
| 3:2022cv00010 |
| February 1, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| Edward B Atkins |
| Gregory F VanTatenhove |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 4, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
SCHEDULING ORDER: Parties shall exchange initial disclosures by 3/24/2022. Plaintiffs shall make initial disclosures of expert reports by 12/15/22 and Defendants by 2/15/2023. Discovery due by 7/31/2023. Plaintiffs shall have up to and including 8/15/22 and defendants have up to 10/14/22, to seek leave to join additional parties or amend their pleadings. Dispositive Motions due by 8/31/2023. FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE set for 1/2/2024 at 01:30 PM in FRANKFORT. JURY TRIAL set for 1/15/2024 at 10:00 AM in FRANKFORT. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1) (A) this matter is referred to a Magistrate Judge Atkins. Signed by Judge Gregory F. VanTatenhove on 3/25/2022.(CBD)cc: COR, D
|
|
Filing 11
NOTICE OF FILING by Timothy Davis NOTICE OF FILING PLAINTIFF'S INITIAL DISCLOSURES PURSUANT TO FRCP 26(a)(1) (Morris, Douglas)
|
|
Filing 10
JOINT REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (McGuffin, Robin)
|
|
***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Judge Van Tatenhove for review: #10 Report of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting (CBD)
|
|
NOTICE FOR ATTORNEY TO UPDATE ADDRESS to Brian Gibson,: It appears the address listed on your filing #10 Report of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting is different than the address registered with our Court. Pursuant to the Court's Administrative Policies and Procedures governing ECF, a request to update your address must be processed through your PACER account. Please visit the Court's website at www.kyed.uscourts.gov for information or contact the Help Desk at 1-866-485-6349. cc: COR (CBD) Modified text on 3/23/2022 (CBD).
|
|
Clerk's Note: Notice for Attorney to Update Address was updated to remove the attorney name Robin McGuffin. (CBD)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER: Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice #8 is GRANTED; and Jonathan Tyler Woy is admitted pro hac vice as counsel for Defendant Sig Sauer, Inc.. Signed by Judge Gregory F. VanTatenhove on 3/15/2022.(CBD)cc: COR and Jonathan Tyler Woy by US Mail
|
|
NOTICE FOR ATTORNEY TO REQUEST E-Filing Privileges to Jonathan Tyler Woy: re #9 Order. A Pro Hac Vice e-Filing request must be processed through your PACER account. IMPORTANT NOTICE: You are required to electronically file and receive electronic service from the court's automated Electronic Case Filing (ECF) system. If you are not a registered Filing User for the Court's ECF system, please visit the Court's website at www.kyed.uscourts.gov for information and/or training. For additional assistance contact the Help Desk at 1-866-485-6349. cc: COR and via U.S. Mail to Jonathan Tyler Woy (CBD)
|
|
BAR STATUS Check completed re #8 MOTION for Jonathan Tyler Woy to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Sig Sauer, Inc. (CBD)
|
|
***MOTION SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Judge Van Tatenhove for review: re #8 MOTION for Jonathan Tyler Woy to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Sig Sauer, Inc. (CBD)
|
|
Attorney Update. Attorney Jonathan Tyler Woy for Sig Sauer, Inc. added. (CBD)
|
|
Filing 8
MOTION for Jonathan Tyler Woy to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Sig Sauer, Inc. ( Filing fee $125; receipt number AKYEDC-5212974) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Woy Declaration, #2 Exhibit B - Woy Certificiate of Good Standing, #3 Proposed Order)(Hixson, Marshall)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER: granting #6 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Brian Keith Gibson. Signed by Judge Gregory F. VanTatenhove on 2/25/2022. (CBD)cc: COR and Brian Keith Gibson by US Mail
|
|
Filing 6
MOTION for Brian Keith Gibson to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Sig Sauer, Inc. ( Filing fee $125; receipt number AKYEDC-5197664) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-Affidavit of Brian Keith Gibson, #2 Exhibit 2-Certificate of Good Standing, #3 Proposed Order)(Hixson, Marshall)
|
|
BAR STATUS Check completed as to Brian Keith Gibson re #6 MOTION for Brian Keith Gibson to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Sig Sauer, Inc. ( Filing fee $125; receipt number AKYEDC-5197664). (JJ)
|
|
***MOTION SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Judge Gregory F. Van Tatenhove for review: re #6 MOTION for Brian Keith Gibson to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Sig Sauer, Inc. ( Filing fee $125; receipt number AKYEDC-5197664) (JJ)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER FOR MEETING AND REPORT: No later than thirty (30) days from the date of entry and service of this order, counsel for the parties shall conduct the meeting of parties required by Rule 26(f). No later than ten (10) days after the meeting, counsel for the parties shall file a written joint report outlining the proposed discovery plan.. Signed by Judge Gregory F. VanTatenhove on 2/14/2022. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(CBD)cc: COR
|
|
Filing 4
ANSWER to Complaint by Sig Sauer, Inc..(Hixson, Marshall)
|
|
***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Judge Gregory F. Van Tatenhove for review: #4 Answer to Complaint, #1 Notice of Removal, (JJ)
|
|
Filing 3
FRCP 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Sig Sauer, Inc. (JJ)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Shelby Circuit Court, case number 22-CI-00016. ( Filing fee $402; receipt number AKYEDC-5181127), filed by Sig Sauer, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 State Court Record, #2 Plaintiff's Letter, #3 Declaration of Steven Shawver, #4 State Court Notice of Removal, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(JJ)
|
|
Conflict Check run. (JJ)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
