Bells v. Sargent
| Charlie Bells, Jr. |
| Rodget Sargent |
| 3:2022cv00015 |
| March 24, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| P SO |
| Gregory F VanTatenhove |
| Prisoner Petitions (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 JUDGMENT: 1. Plaintiff's complaint [R. #1 ] is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; 2. This action is DISMISSED and STRICKEN from the Court's docket; and 3. This is a FINAL and APPEALABLE Judgment and there is no just cause for delay. Signed by Judge Gregory F. Van Tatenhove on 5/19/2022.(JJ)cc: COR and Charlie Bells, Jr, by US Mail |
Filing 10
ORDER: 1. Mr. Bells' "complaint" [R. #1 ] is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; 2. Any pending request for relief, including Bells's "Motion for Order" [R. #7 ], is DENIED AS MOOT; 3. The Court will enter an appropriate Judgment; and 4. This matter is DISMISSED and STRICKEN from the Court's docket. Signed by Judge Gregory F. Van Tatenhove on 5/19/2022.(JJ)cc: COR and Charlie Bells, Jr, by US Mail
|
| Filing 9 Letter from Charlie Bells, Jr. requesting a courtesy copy docket sheet and blank forms. Clerk mailed forms to Charlie Bell, Jr. at new address. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope - Post marked 5/2/2022) (JJ) |
| Filing 8 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Charlie Bells, Jr., pro se, re #6 Order. (CBD) |
| ***MOTION SUBMITTED TO PSO for review: re #7 MOTION for Order by Charlie Bells, Jr (JJ) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Order by Charlie Bells, Jr, pro se. Motions referred to P SO. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Mailing Envelope - Post marked 4/13/2021)(JJ) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER : 1. Mr. Bells' motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis [R. #2 ] is DENIED; 2. Clerk shall mark the assigned case number on a form Civil Rights Complaint [EDKY Form 520] and send it to Mr. Bells; 3. Should Mr. Bells wish to pursue this claim, he must complete and file the complaint form in its entirety, describing the facts of his case, specifically identifying the people, dates, places, and actions which are relevant to his claims, and explain what he wants the Court to do; 4. In addition, Mr. Bells must pay the $402.00 filing and administrative fees in full to the Clerk of the Court; and 5. Mr. Bells must take both of these steps within 30 days from the date of this Order, or the case will be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute and for failure to comply with a Court Order. Signed by Judge Gregory F. Van Tatenhove on 4/12/2022.(JJ)cc: COR and Charlie Bells, Jr, by US Mail
|
| Filing 5 Letter from Charlie Bells, Jr., pro se, requesting copy of docket sheet, forms and address for AUSA London division. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (CBD) |
| CLERK'S VIRTUAL NOTICE TO Charlie Bells, Jr. re #5 Letter : A courtesy copy of the docket sheet in the above-styled case is enclosed. If you would like a copy of any document previously filed in your record, please send a request to the Office of the Clerk noting the docket entry number for each copy requested. You will receive a response advising you of the total number of pages and the amount of money required to obtain the requested copies. Copies of the documents in your record will require a pre-payment of 50 cents per page. In response to your request for the London Division US Attorneys address, please note the address is: U.S. Attorney's Office, 601 Meyers Baker Road, Suite 200, London KY 40741-3035. Please find enclosed copies of EDKY forms in response to your request for same. cc: Charlie Bells, Jr. by US Mail (CBD) |
| Filing 4 SUPPLEMENT re #1 Complaint (Referred) by Charlie Bells, Jr, pro se. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope - No post date)(JJ) |
| Filing 3 IMPORTANT NOTICE to Pro Se Filer: Information relating to pro se filings and F.R.Civ.P. 5.2 requiring personal identifiers be partially redacted from documents filed with the court. #Click here for more information on the rules. It is the sole responsibility of counsel and the parties to comply with the rules requiring redaction of personal data identifiers.cc: pro se filer via U.S. Mail (Attachments: #1 Sample Caption)(JJ) |
| Conflict Check run. (JJ) |
| ***MOTION SUBMITTED TO PSO for review: re #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Charlie Bells, Jr (JJ) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Charlie Bells, Jr, pro se. Motions referred to P SO. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(JJ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Charlie Bells, Jr., pro se. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelopes - Post dated 3/22/2022)(JJ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Bells v. Sargent | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Charlie Bells, Jr. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Rodget Sargent | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
