Dawan v. State of Kentucky

Plaintiff: Yusuf Mujahid Dawan
Defendant: State of Kentucky
Case Number: 3:2022cv00044
Filed: August 16, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Presiding Judge: William O Bertelsman
Referring Judge: P SO
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 18, 2022 Filing 7 ORDER OF DISMISSAL: 1. Complaint #1 is DISMISSED; 2. This action is DISMISSED and STRICKEN from the Court's docket. Signed by Judge William O. Bertelsman on 8/18/22.(CBD)cc: COR and Yusef M. Dawan by US Mail
August 17, 2022 Filing 6 STANDING ORDER re: Disclosure of Contact Information: 1. pro se litigants must provide current telephone number, residential address, & if different, mailing address. 2. pro se litigants must provide written notice of change of residential address, & if different, mailing address. 3. Clerk file copy of Order in all non-prisoner pro se actions. Failure to provide required information or change of address may result in appropriate sanctions. (CBD)cc: COR and Yusef M. Dawan by US Mail
August 16, 2022 Filing 4 IMPORTANT NOTICE to Pro Se Filer: Information relating to pro se filings and F.R.Civ.P. 5.2 requiring personal identifiers be partially redacted from documents filed with the court. #Click here for more information on the rules. It is the sole responsibility of counsel and the parties to comply with the rules requiring redaction of personal data identifiers.cc: pro se filer via U.S. Mail (Attachments: #1 Sample Caption Page)(CBD)
August 16, 2022 Filing 3 CASE TRANSFERRED IN from District of Ohio Southern. Case number 1:22-cv-00467. Original file, certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received electronically. cc: Y. Dawan w/ copy of docket via US Mail
August 16, 2022 Filing 2 ORDER OF TRANSFER - the Clerk of Courts is hereby DIRECTED TO TRANSFER this case to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky for all further proceedings. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 08/16/2022. (bjc)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) [Transferred from ohsd on 8/16/2022.]
August 16, 2022 Case transferred to Eastern District of Kentucky.Case file and docket sheet sent Electronically. (bjc) [Transferred from ohsd on 8/16/2022.]
August 16, 2022 Conflict Check run. (CBD)
August 16, 2022 ***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of PSO for review: #2 Order, #1 Complaint (CBD)
August 12, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against State of Kentucky, filed by Yusef M. Dawan (Submitted as is without a civil cover sheet, service documents, or IFP Motion. No payment was submitted). (bjc) [Transferred from ohsd on 8/16/2022.] Modified text on 8/17/2022 (CBD).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dawan v. State of Kentucky
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Yusuf Mujahid Dawan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: State of Kentucky
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?