Hope of Kentucky, LLC et al v. Cameron
| Hope of Kentucky, LLC and Kentucky Bankers Association |
| Daniel Cameron |
| 3:2022cv00062 |
| November 10, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| Gregory F VanTatenhove |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Declaratory Judgemen |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 29, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER: 1. Parties' Motion for a Briefing Schedule [R. #11 ] is GRANTED; 2. Plaintiffs SHALL reply to their motion to remand and SHALL respond to Attorney General Cameron's motion to dismiss on or before 1/16/2023; 3. Attorney General Cameron SHALL reply to the Plaintiff's response to his motion to dismiss within 14 days after the Plaintiffs file their brief; and, 4. All filings SHALL comply with Local Rule 7.1(d). Signed by Judge Gregory F. Van Tatenhove on 12/13/2022.(JJ)cc: COR
|
|
Filing 11
Proposed Agreed Order for Briefing Schedule by Daniel Cameron. (Thacker, Christopher)
|
|
***MOTION SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Judge Gregory F. Van Tatenhove for review: re #11 Proposed Agreed Order for Briefing Schedule by Daniel Cameron (JJ)
|
|
Filing 10
RESPONSE in Opposition re #6 MOTION to Remand to State Court by Hope of Kentucky, LLC, Kentucky Bankers Association filed by Daniel Cameron. (Thacker, Christopher)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER: 1. Attorney General Cameron SHALL respond to the Plaintiffs' Motion for an Extension of Time [R. #8 ] within three days of entry of this Order; 2. Attorney General Cameron SHALL indicate his reasoning for opposing the Plaintiffs' preference that the Court extend the response deadline for the motion to dismiss to twenty days after the Court rules on the motion for remand; and, 3. Attorney General Cameron SHALL state whether he agrees with or opposes the Plaintiffs' alternative request that the Court set the deadline for the response to the motion to dismiss as 1/16/2023. Signed by Judge Gregory F. Van Tatenhove on 12/9/2022.(JJ)cc: COR
|
|
Filing 8
MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #7 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by Daniel Cameron and Failure to State a Claim by Hope of Kentucky, LLC, Kentucky Bankers Association (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order Extending Time To 20 Days After Ruling, #2 Proposed Order Proposed Order Extending Time To January 16, 2023)(Senn, M.)
|
|
Filing 7
MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by Daniel Cameron and Failure to State a Claim (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order Granting)(Thacker, Christopher)
|
|
Filing 6
MOTION to Remand to State Court by Hope of Kentucky, LLC, Kentucky Bankers Association (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Exhibit Exh. A - Cross River Bank Opinion, #3 Proposed Order)(Senn, M.)
|
|
Filing 5
FRCP 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Kentucky Bankers Association. (Senn, M.)
|
|
Filing 4
FRCP 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Hope of Kentucky, LLC identifying Corporate Parent KBA Services, Inc. for Hope of Kentucky, LLC.. (Senn, M.)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Hope of Kentucky, LLC, Kentucky Bankers Association. (Senn, M.)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Franklin Circuit Court, case number 22-CI-842 ( Filing fee $402; receipt number AKYEDC-5409610), filed by Daniel Cameron. (Attachments: #1 State Court Record - Complaint for Declaration of Rights and Injunctive Relief, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(CBD)
|
|
Conflict Check run. (CBD)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
