Woods v. Morris Mohawk Gaming Group et al
| Billi Jo Woods |
| Morris Mohawk Gaming Group, Alwyn Morris, Calvin Ayre and Harp Media BV |
| 3:2023cv00053 |
| August 8, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| Gregory F VanTatenhove |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Fraud |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| NOTICE OF FEE REFUND APPROVED re #1 Complaint, ; the fee transaction involving Receipt No. BKYEDC-5620261 having been erroneously paid, the Clerk APPROVES the refund by processing a credit through the electronic credit card system. The credit refund transaction in the amount of $ 402.00 was successfully completed on 8/11/2023 at 02:08:14 PM cc: COR (CBD) |
| Filing 5 REQUEST FOR FEE REFUND TO CREDIT CARD by Billi Jo Woods . (Fairbanks, Philip) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Calvin Ayre, Harp Media BV, Alwyn Morris, Morris Mohawk Gaming Group and returned to counsel electronically for service. (Attachments: #1 Harp Media, #2 Calvin Ayre, #3 Alwyn Morris)(CBD) |
| Filing 3 FRCP 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Billi Jo Woods. (CBD) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $402; receipt number BKYEDC-562026), filed by Billi Jo Woods. (Attachments: #1 Summons Morris Mohawk Gaming, #2 Summons Harp Media BV, #3 Summons Calvin Ayre, #4 Summons Alwyn Morris, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(CBD) |
| Conflict Check run. (CBD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
