Couch v. Akers
Alastair Couch |
Daniel Akers |
3:2024cv00006 |
January 22, 2024 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
Edward B Atkins |
Matthew A Stinnett |
Gregory F VanTatenhove |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 20, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 NOTICE OF FILING of the relevant briefs, opinions, dispositive orders, and motions from the state court by Daniel Akers re #9 Order (Attachments: #1 Appendix Index, #2 Appendix Brief for Appellant, #3 Appendix Brief for Appellee, #4 Appendix Reply Brief, #5 Appendix KYSC Opinion, #6 Appendix Appellant's Motion, #7 Appendix KYCA Order, #8 Appendix Appellant's Resp to Order, #9 Appendix KYCA order, #10 Appendix Franklin Cir Ct Order, #11 Appendix Couch's Resp to CC Order, #12 Appendix Appellant's Notice, #13 Appendix Brief for Appellant, #14 Appendix Brief for Appellee, #15 Appendix Reply Brief, #16 Appendix KYCA Opinion, #17 Appendix KYSC Order Denying DR)(Hightower, Courtney) Modified on 3/20/2024 (JJ). |
Filing 13 NOTICE of Compliance re #9 Order by Daniel Akers (Hightower, Courtney) Modified text on 3/12/2024 (CBD). |
Filing 12 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Daniel Akers. (Hightower, Courtney) |
|
|
|
Filing 7 IMPORTANT NOTICE to Pro Se Filer: Information relating to pro se filings and F.R.Civ.P. 5.2 requiring personal identifiers be partially redacted from documents filed with the court. #Click here for more information on the rules. It is the sole responsibility of counsel and the parties to comply with the rules requiring redaction of personal data identifiers.cc: pro se filer via U.S. Mail (Attachments: #1 Sample Caption)(JJ) |
Filing 6 MOTION for an Evidentiary Hearing & Request for the Appointment of Counsel by Alastair Couch, pro se. Motions referred to Matthew A. Stinnett. (JJ) |
Filing 5 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Alastair Couch, pro se. (JJ) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Alastair Couch, pro se. Motions referred to Matthew A. Stinnett. (JJ) |
Filing 3 MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT of #1 filed by Alastair Couch, pro se. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(JJ) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Alastair Couch, pro se. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope - Post Marked 1/17/2024)(JJ) |
Conflict Check run. (JJ) |
***MOTION SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Magistrate Judge Matthew A. Stinnett for review: re #4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Alastair Couch, #6 MOTION for Evidentiary Hearing & Request for Appointment of Counsel by Alastair Couch (JJ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Couch v. Akers | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Alastair Couch | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Daniel Akers | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.