Blackburn v. Tetra Tech, Inc. et al
| Gary Blackburn |
| Tetra Tech, Inc. and Steve Turner |
| 3:2024cv00029 |
| April 8, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| Gregory F VanTatenhove |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 FRCP 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Tetra Tech, Inc.. (U'Sellis, Megan) |
| Filing 4 FRCP 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Tetra Tech, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent BlackRock, Inc. for Tetra Tech, Inc... (U'Sellis, Megan) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY RE: FAILURE TO FILE FRCP 7.1 DISCLOSURES to counsel of record, Megan R. USellis. #1 Notice of Removal has been filed by Tetra Tech, Inc. without the required Rule 7.1 Disclosure statement. Rule 7.1 Disclosures must be filed within fourteen (14) calendar days. Failure to file the Disclosure Statement will cause the case to be submitted to the presiding judge for further action. cc: COR (JJ) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Carroll Circuit Court, case number 24-CI-00045. ( Filing fee $405; receipt number AKYEDC-580986), filed by Tetra Tech, Inc., Steve Turner. (Attachments: #1 State Court Record, #2 Affidavit Steve Turner)(JJ) |
| Conflict Check run. (JJ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
